认罪认罚从宽制度下相对限制被追诉人上诉权的问题探究  

Exploration of the Relative Restriction of the Right of Appeal of the Accused under the System of Leniency of Guilty Pleas and Penalties

作　　者：李集合[1] 王培雨 Li Jihe;Wang Peiyu(Northwest University of Political Science and Law,Xi'an,Shaanxi 710122)

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学,陕西西安710122

出　　处：《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2025年第1期81-89,共9页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College

摘　　要：认罪认罚从宽制度在我国已经广泛运用,对于案件的繁简分流效果显著,节约司法资源并加强了我国司法治理能力。但目前对于认罪认罚案件的上诉问题的法律规定不尽完善,关于被追诉人的上诉权问题,是否限制上诉权一直备受争议。结合学术界的观点和域内、域外的司法实践,阐明认罪认罚从宽制度下,被追诉人上诉权应当相对限制。通过法理分析、价值判断、可实施性来阐述相对限制上诉权的合理性的同时,应对认罪认罚案件被告人上诉权应相对限制的问题,可以通过保障被追诉人上诉权利和提出上诉理由审查制、合理规制上诉权入手,完善认罪认罚案件中被追诉人上诉权的相对限制。The system of leniency in plea for leniency has been widely used in our country,which has a significant effect on the diversion of cases,saves judicial resources and strengthens the capacity of judicial governance in our country.However,the current legal provisions on the appeal of plea for leniency cases are not perfect,and it has been controversial whether to restrict the right of appeal of the prosecuted person.Combined with the views of academics and judicial practice in the region and abroad,it is clarified that under the system of leniency of guilty pleas and penalties,the right of appeal of the prosecuted person should be relatively restricted.While elaborating on the reasonableness of the relative restriction of the right to appeal through legal analysis,value judgement and enforceability,the relative restriction of the defendant's right to appeal in plea for leniency cases can be improved by guaranteeing the right of appeal of the accused and by proposing a system of review of the grounds of appeal,as well as by reasonably regulating the right to appeal.

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽制度 被追诉人上诉问题 相对限制上诉权 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]