奥斯维辛之后的启蒙重构——重访阿多诺的文化批评观念  

Reconstruction of Enlightenment after Auschwitz—Revisiting Theodor W.Adorno,s Concept of Cultural Critique

作　　者：朱兆斌 Zhaobin ZHU(Peking University)

机构地区：[1]北京大学艺术学院

出　　处：《马克思主义美学研究》2024年第2期201-217,402,共18页Research on Marxist Aesthetics

基　　金：中国文学艺术基金会、中国文学艺术发展专项基金资助;国家社科基金重大项目“马克思主义文学理论关键词及当代意义研究”(18ZDA275)阶段性成果

摘　　要：作为“启蒙之子”,阿多诺不仅仅在重构批评方式,还在重构启蒙方式,即重构一种与康德相似却又不同于康德的启蒙方式。阿多诺试图从文化工业逻辑、极权主义场域、意识形态机制等多方面出发,重构奥斯维辛之后的文化批评;与此同时,他试图推进一种超越先验批评与内在分析的内在批评,从而打通作品的内部空间(文本构造)与外部空间(社会历史)。与此文化批评观念相配合,阿多诺选择以论说文来实现其思想的有效表达。论说文的形式建构反映了阿多诺的思想方式,并呈现一种文体乌托邦。但是,他的新启蒙策略只有在新问题的检测中才能得到更为全面的定位与评判。As the“son of enlightenment”,Theodor W.Adorno not only reconstructs critical methods,but also reconstructs the way of enlightenment,that is,to reconstruct a similar but different way of enlightenment from Kant.Adorno tried to reconstruct the cultural critique after Auschwitz from the logic of cultural industry,the field of totalitarianism,the ideological mechanism and other aspects;At the same time,he tried to promote an immanent criticism beyond transcendental criticism and internal analysis,so as to open up the internal space(text structure)and external space(social history)of the works.In line with the concept of cultural critique,Adorno chose to use argumentative writing to effectively express his ide⁃as.The formal construction of argumentative writing reflects Adorno's way of thinking and presents a literary utopia.However,his new enlightenment strategy could only be more com⁃prehensively positioned and evaluated in the detection of new problems.

关 键 词：阿多诺 文化批评 奥斯维辛 新启蒙 论说文 

分 类 号：G02[文化科学]