摹仿的内向性与外向性——哈利维尔对亚里士多德摹仿说的重释  

Inwardness and Outwardness of Mimesis:Stephen Halliwell’s Reinterpretation of Aristotle’s Theory of Mimesis

作　　者：董思奇 Dong Siqi

机构地区：[1]武汉大学文学院

出　　处：《中国美学研究》2024年第2期239-253,共15页

摘　　要：斯蒂芬·哈利维尔指出,亚里士多德以内在的“意向性”(intentionality)和外在的“生产性”(productivity)系统化了摹仿理论,并提出了和谐整一的评判标准,使摹仿摆脱了二元对立、进退两难的局面。向内,摹仿以理性与感性交织的心理层次实现了艺术创作者、表演者到观众的情感传输;向外,摹仿以从个人到社会的现实影响达到了艺术接受者与外在现实世界的联结。内外相应,完成了从艺术家、作品、观众、世界的环形论证。研究和探讨哈利维尔基于当下语境对亚里士多德摹仿理论与美学史书写进行的回顾与反思,有利于重新发掘“二重性”摹仿理论的价值,也有利于实现中西摹仿美学的交流会通。Stephen Halliwell points out that Aristotle systematized the theory of mimesis with the internal“intentionality”and external“productivity”,and proposed a harmonious and unified criterion for evaluation,freeing mimesis from the situation of dualistic opposition and dilemma.Internally,mimesis achieves the emotional transmission from artistic creators,performers to the audience through the psychological level of intertwined rationality and sensibility.Externally,mimesis establishes the connection between artistic recipients and the external real world through its realistic influence from the individual to society.With both inside and outside inter-corresponding,it completes the circular argumentation from the artist,the work,the audience,and finally to the world.Studying and discussing Halliwell’s review and reflection on Aristotle’s theory of mimesis and the writing of aesthetic history based on the current context is conducive to rediscovering the value of the“duality”mimesis theory and facilitating the exchange and communication between Chinese and Western mimetic aesthetics.

关 键 词：摹仿美学 意向性 生产性 《诗学》 亚里士多德 

分 类 号：B83-0[哲学宗教—美学]