检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔宝月 付民 闫品卓 屈甜甜 CUI Baoyue;FU Min;YAN Pinzhuo;QU Tiantian(Department of Pharmacy,Nanyang Second General Hospital,Nanyang 473000,He’nan,China;Department of Oncology,Nanyang Second General Hospital,Nanyang 473000,He’nan,China)
机构地区:[1]南阳市第二人民医院药学部,河南南阳473000 [2]南阳市第二人民医院肿瘤科,河南南阳473000
出 处:《癌症进展》2025年第3期361-364,共4页Oncology Progress
基 金:南阳市科技发展计划项目(KJGG077)。
摘 要:目的 评估不同药学科普干预方式对肝癌患者依从性的影响。方法 将96例肝癌患者按照干预方式的不同分为对照组49例(常规用药教育)和观察组47例(药师宣教+科普推送干预),统计并比较两组患者依从性、不良反应发生情况及满意度。结果 观察组依从性优于对照组,不良反应总发生率低于对照组,满意度高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。结论 药师宣教+科普推送可有效改善肝癌患者用药依从性,减少药物不良反应的发生,提高满意度,具有良好的应用价值。Objective To evaluate the influence of different pharmaceutical popular science intervention methods on compliance of patients with liver cancer.Method A total of 96 cases of liver cancer patients were divided into control group(routine medication education,n=49)and observation group(pharmacist education+popular science push intervention,n=47)according to different intervention methods.The compliance,adverse reactions and satisfaction of the two groups were statistically compared.Result The compliance of the observation group was better than that of the control group,the total incidence of adverse reactions was lower than that of the control group,and the satisfaction was higher than that of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Pharmacist education+popular science push can effectively improve the medication compliance of patients with liver cancer,reduce the incidence of adverse drug reactions,and improve satisfaction,which has good application value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49