检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘文勇 LIU Wenyong
机构地区:[1]四川大学文学与新闻学院
出 处:《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第1期14-24,共11页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“民国时期的中国古典文论研究”(21BZW023)。
摘 要:民国学界富于批评精神,这一点在民国时期的中国古典文论研究界也表现明显。他们既工诃古人,更工诃今人。他们批评“喜谤前辈”的“今之少年”,批评以西方文艺之眼光与见解检讨国学,批评“衡文及乎异域”的时代现象,批评今之称赞《文心雕龙》的人为庸人,批评今人不能深知韩愈的真精神,批评反传统的“覆古派”。总之,他们既在整体上对现代以来中国古典文论的研究进行批评,又对王国维、章太炎、范文澜、陈钟凡、郭绍虞、罗根泽、陈延杰等具体的古典文论研究者和他们的著作进行批评。无论其批评是对是错,与此前批评界大多温柔敦厚的态度相比,都批评得一针见血,坦率认真。The so-called Chinese classical literary theory is also known as the history of Chinese literary criticism.Regarding the history of criticism,Mr.Qian Zhongshu once said in his article Chinese Poetry and Chinese Painting that“the study of the history of criticism is ultimately for criticism”.Based on this reasoning,the research on the study of the history of criticism is ultimately for criticism.From this,we can see two types of criticism:One is the criticism of ancient Chinese poetry and prose by scholars of the Republic of China,and the other is the criticism of the study of critical history by scholars of the Republic of China at that time.However,since the 1980s,the focus of academic research on the study of Chinese classical literary theory during the Republic of China period has mostly remained on the discussion of professional issues in classical literary theory,with little attention paid to the sharp criticism and evaluation of ancient Chinese poetry and prose by scholars of the Republic of China when studying classical literary theory.Obviously,this is a research flaw that should be addressed in today s research.The former will be dealt with separately,while the latter is the focus of this article.The academic community of the Republic of China was full of critical spirit,which was evident in the research community of classical Chinese literary theory during the Republic of China period.They are good at criticizing the ancients and better at criticizing the people of the time.They criticized the young people who liked to criticize their predecessors,criticized the phenomenon of explaining Chinese literature and art from the perspective and insights of Western literature and art,criticized the people who praised The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons at the time as mediocre people,criticized the people at that time for not being able to fully understand Han Yu s true spirit,and criticized anti-traditional scholars.In short,they not only criticize the research on modern Chinese classical literary
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33