检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:古典 GU Dian(Anhui University,Hefei 230031,China)
出 处:《哈尔滨学院学报》2025年第3期63-68,共6页Journal of Harbin University
基 金:2022年度国家社会科学基金后期资助项目,项目编号:22FFXB062。
摘 要:当下,法院已通过认罪认罚从宽制度参与到涉罪企业合规案件的审理中,并呈现出两种不同的实践样态。为确保法院审理合规案件的效果,有必要参考检察院审查合规案件的相关事项,结合法院审理认罪认罚案件的审查内容,确定法院审理合规案件时所需审查的事项,并根据不同情况下法院的职责要求,对审查事项进行区分。同时,需要结合法院审理案件的实际需求,积极探寻法院对第三方机制的运用方式,明确合规考察书面报告的证据属性,以充分发挥司法建议制度的社会治理功能。Currently,courts have engaged in the trial of corporate compliance cases through the system of leniency for pleading guilty and accepting punishment,presenting two distinct practical patterns.To ensure the effectiveness of court adjudication in compliance cases,it is necessary to refer to the relevant matters reviewed by the prosecution in compliance cases,combining them with the review content of plea bargain cases adjudicated by the court.This will help determine the review matters required during the court’s adjudication of compliance cases and differentiate the review matters based on the court’s responsibilities in various situations.At the same time,it is essential to actively explore the court’s application of third party mechanisms in light of the actual needs of case adjudication and clarify the evidential attributes of written compliance assessment reports,so as to fully leverage the social governance function of the judicial recommendation system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70