审美主体性的未来范式何以可能——以美学现代问题下的康德“准-有机体”范式为进路  

Possibility of a Future Paradigm of Aesthetic Subjectivity——A Kantian"Quasi-Organism"Approach to Modern Problematics in Aesthetics

作　　者：张道中 ZHANG Daozhong(School of Philosophy,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学哲学学院,北京100875

出　　处：《太原学院学报(社会科学版)》2025年第3期8-21,共14页Journal of Taiyuan University(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：现代问题作为审美现代性的主问题式,聚焦主体性及其细化特征以直接回应现代性生活范式迭代下的主体变况。而今,以二维递归逻辑生成的人工智能已渐迭代为三维耦合逻辑建构的生成式人工智能,并由此对美学主体的概念构建产生颠覆性影响。仍然沿主体性基本概念及细化的美学主体性逻辑探讨生成式人工智能语境下的美学主体性问题将会缺乏阐释张力。回到人工智能是否具备主体意识这一根本问题的论争场域中,可以发现其基本原则直接上溯至18世纪康德有机体与笛卡尔机械论的对举。由此出发,在确证康德美学理论于当代语境的可用性后采用具身性、有机体两条理论进路,以目的论为抓手在康德话语体系中构建二元审美主体,达至美学现代问题视野下创制未来主体性的康德式可能路径。Hie"modem problematic",the central episteme of aesthetic modernity,concentrates on subjectivity and its nu-anced characteristics to directly address transformations of the human subject amid evolving paradigms of modem life.Contemporary advancements in A1 evolving from two-dimensional recursive logic to three-dimensional coupling logic in generative AI now exert disruptive impacts on the conceptualization of aesthetic subjectivity.Continuing to employ ciassieal subjectivity frameworks and derivative aesthetic paradigms to analyze generative AI's impact on aesthetic agency inevitably lacks the requisite explanatory capacity.By revisiting the foundational 18th-century Kantian-Cartesian dichotomy(organism vs.mechanism)that underlies current disputes about AI consciousness,this study reactivates Kantian aesthetics for contemporary application.Through dual theoretical pathways of embodiment and organic purposiveness,the paper reconstructs a binary aesthetic subjectivity within Kantian discourse.By using teleology as an analytical fulcrum,it proposes a Kantian-inspired trajectory for forging future subjectivity paradigms within the horizon of aesthetic modernity.

关 键 词：美学现代问题 审美主体 人工智能 康德 准-有机体 

分 类 号：B83-0[哲学宗教—美学]