《老子指归》的“道”本根论  

On the Fundamental Root of"Dao"in Essence of Laozi

作　　者：赵景飞 ZHAO Jingfei(School of Marxism,Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Guiyang Guizhou 550025,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州中医药大学马克思主义学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《乐山师范学院学报》2025年第3期79-85,118,共8页Journal of Leshan Normal University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“《鹖冠子》诠解”(23FZXB030);贵州中医药大学博士启动基金项目“《老子指归》研究”(〔2019〕92)。

摘　　要：由于汉代哲学的背景,严遵的《老子指归》中带有明显的宇宙论哲学的痕迹;因此,其本体论建构的理论诉求易被忽视。严遵借用宇宙演化的形式,将形上之“道”与形下之“器”贯通起来,再以“有生于无,实生于虚”为线索,逆向探寻多样世界背后的统一之“宗”“祖”,并最终确立“道”的大本大根的地位。这一方面打破了汉代神学目的论对思想领域的垄断,另一方面则开启了以“虚”“无”论道的新风,对其后中国哲学的发展产生了深远影响。Due to the background of Han Dynasty philosophy,Yan Zun's Essence of Laozi bears obvious characteristics of cosmological philosophy,making the theoretical attempts of its ontological construction prone to being overlooked.Yan Zun borrowed the form of cosmic evolution to connect the metaphysical"Dao"with the realistic"matter",and then used"existence arises from nothingness,reality arises from emptiness"as a clue to explore the unified"origin"behind the diverse world in reverse,and ultimately established the status of"Dao"as the fundamental root.On the one hand,this broke the monopoly of theological teleology in the ideological sphere during Han Dynasty,and on the other hand,it opened up a new trend of discussing"Dao"with"emptiness"and"nothingness",exerting a profound impact on the development of Chinese philosophy thereafter.

关 键 词：严遵 《老子指归》 本根论 道 

分 类 号：B234.99[哲学宗教—中国哲学]