刑事惩罚性视野下非羁押型强制措施折抵刑期研究  

Study on the Conversion of Non-Custodial Compulsory Measures from the Perspective of Criminal Punishment

作　　者：张文杰 Zhang Wenjie

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院 [2]东南大学反腐败法治研究中心

出　　处：《江海学刊》2025年第2期191-198,256,共9页Jianghai Academic Journal

摘　　要：我国强制措施折抵刑期制度尽管规定复杂、折算关系多元,但存在折算的强制措施种类不全面、折算关系不协调等问题。从整体上把握强制措施的刑期折抵关系,需要厘清刑期折抵的教义学根据。强制措施中隐含的刑事惩罚性是其能够进行刑期折抵的实质根据。随着《刑事诉讼法》修改对指定居所监视居住强制措施的增设及定位,以及扩充性规定指定居所监视居住对相关刑罚的折抵,非羁押型强制措施具有的刑事惩罚性质得到了承认,具有进步意义。应针对我国当前未纳入刑期折抵体系的非羁押型强制措施,全面系统建构刑期折抵制度,并赋予法官一定的刑期折抵裁量权,以应对司法实践中可能存在的刑期折抵的必要性和技术性问题。Although the system of conversion for compulsory measures(CM)in China is complicated and the conversion relationship(CR)is diversified,there are still problems of incomplete types of CM and uncoordinated CR.It is necessary to clarify the doctrinal basis of the commutation of the sentence to grasp CR of CM wholly.With the amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law that added provisions on CM,the law has also expanded the provisions regarding the offset and conversion relationship between non-custodial CM and relevant penalties,thus recognizing that non-custodial CM also has the nature of criminal punishment.For non-custodial measures not currently included in China’s commutation system,commutation proportions should be designed based on their nature,and judges should be granted discretion to address potential calculation issues in practice.

关 键 词：强制措施 刑期折抵 刑事惩罚性 非羁押型强制措施 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]