论晚明布衣学者胡应麟的墨学研究  

On the Mohism Research of a Lay Scholar HU Yinglin in the Late Ming Dynasty

作　　者：蒋威 JIANG Wei(Faculty of Arts,Zaozhuang University,Zaozhuang 277160,China)

机构地区：[1]枣庄学院文学院,山东枣庄277160

出　　处：《枣庄学院学报》2025年第1期80-87,共8页Journal of Zaozhuang University

基　　金：2024年度山东省人文社会科学课题(青年人才专项)“明代的墨学研究”(项目编号:2024-QNRC-65)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：晚明布衣学者胡应麟第一次对“墨入杂家”进行了系统的理论阐述,在目录学史及墨学史上均有重要的意义。作为明代墨学保守派的代表,胡应麟将儒、墨尖锐地对立起来,视墨学为异端,认为墨子是诋毁孔子的始作俑者,“行伪而坚,言奸而辩”,当受横议之刑。胡应麟对墨学史上的一些重要问题,如墨学的源流及其后学的嬗变,著名学者论墨,墨家与道教、佛教的联系等问题进行了探讨,对墨学发展史进行了初步的研究。胡应麟的墨学研究在明代的墨学史上具有重要的地位。The late Ming lay scholar HU Yinglin was the first to give a systematic theoretical exposition of"Mo Ru Za Jian",which has important significance in history of bibliology and the history of Mohism.Representing the conservative wing of Mohism in the Ming Dynasty,HU Yinglin sharply opposed Confucianism and Mohism,regarding Mohism asesy and believing that Mozi was the instigator of the slander against Confucius,"practicing fraud and being firm,speaking treachery and beingquent"and should be punished for making groundless accusations.HU Yinglin discussed some important issues in the history of Mohism,such as the source and evolution of Mohism and its later followers,the views famous scholars on Mohism,and the connection between Mohism and Taoism and Buddhism,and made a preliminary study of the history of the development of Mohism.HU Yinglin′s research on Mozi has an important position in the history of Mozi studies in the Ming Dynasty.

关 键 词：明代 胡应麟 墨学 《少室山房笔丛》 

分 类 号：B224[哲学宗教—中国哲学]