“共同体”理论的发展演进与时代创新——兼议中华民族共同体的内涵建构  

The Evolution Logic and Innovative Development of"Community"Theory—Discussion on the Connotation Construction of Chinese National Community

作　　者：马伟华[1] 刀悦 MA Wei-hua;DAO Yue

机构地区：[1]南开大学,天津300350

出　　处：《青海民族研究》2025年第1期64-70,共7页Qinghai Journal of Ethnology

基　　金：教育部重大课题攻关项目“中国式现代化与中华民族共同体建设协同推进研究”(批准号:23JZD032)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：从滕尼斯到美国芝加哥学派对共同体概念的探讨,显示出不同背景下研究倾向的差异性。自此概念进入中国学术话语体系后,各个时期的研究者从本土化情境对此概念进行理解、应用和发展,使这个本与中国文化传统具有一定差异的用语,不断发展成为更具适切性的中华民族共同体概念。对不同阶段共同体概念及理论的新解,能够更好地挖掘其重要学术内涵与时代价值,进而彰显出实地调查研究对于学术概念发展的影响。在构建科学完备的中华民族共同体理论体系中,汲取前人智慧,加强学科之间的有机交叉并开展深入的田野调查,成为当下学界理应努力的方向。From Ferdinand Tonnies to the Chicago School,the exploration of the concept of community reveals the differences in scholars'research inclinations.Since this concept entered the academic discourse system in China,researchers in different periods have understood,applied,and developed it from the perspective of local contexts.Consequently,this term,which initially differed from traditional Chinese culture,has evolved into the more fitting concept of the Chinese national community.By examining the concepts and theories of community at various stages,we can explore its significant academic connotations and contemporary values,thereby highlighting the influence of field-based research on the evolution of academic concepts.In the research aimed at constructing a scientific and comprehensive theoretical system for the Chinese national community,drawing upon the wisdom of predecessors,enhancing the organic intersection of disciplines,and conducting in-depth field investigations have become the directions that the academic community should strive for at present.

关 键 词：共同体 中华民族共同体 理论转向 

分 类 号：C95[社会学—民族学]