检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜映锦[1] 席传杰 胡卸文[1,2] 吴建利 刘波[1] 何坤[1,2] DU Yingjin;XI Chuanjie;HU Xiewen;WU Jianli;LIU Bo;HE Kun(Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China;Sichuan Province En-gineering Technology Research Center of Ecological Mitigation of Geohazards in Tibet Plateau Transportation Corridors,Chengdu 610031,China)
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学地球科学与工程学院,四川成都610031 [2]四川省环青藏高原交通廊道地质灾害生态化防治工程技术研究中心,四川成都610031
出 处:《西南交通大学学报》2025年第2期282-289,共8页Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University
基 金:国家重点研发计划(2018YFC1505401)。
摘 要:灾害易发性评估通常是基于灾害空间分布特征进行概率建模,然而灾害本身存在空间异质性.本文以汶马高速汶川至理县段沿线崩滑灾害为例,为解决灾害的空间异质性问题,利用K-means算法将研究区灾害威胁对象(人员、财产)及危险程度(损毁房屋面积、损毁道路长度)进行空间聚类并赋予研究区不同聚类属性;从水文、地质、地貌条件等方面综合选取坡度、高程、坡向、曲率、地表切割度、河型弯曲系数、距构造带距离、岸坡坡体结构和地层岩性9个因子,将样本划分为70%的训练数据、30%的测试数据,对比K-RF模型与传统RF模型在易发性评估中的性能,以期为高速公路的运营安全及灾害防治提供理论支撑.结果表明:K-RF模型极高易发区共包含82.95%灾害点,相较于单一RF模型取得了更好的评价结果(AUC值提高5.4%);采用聚类的方法解决灾害空间异质性是可行的,但本文局限性在于未能从灾害本身反映灾害空间异质性,耦合模型结果本质上是易发性和易损性的综合反映.Hazard susceptibility assessment is generally a probabilistic modeling based on the spatial distribution characteristics of hazards,but the hazards have spatial heterogeneity.In order to solve the spatial heterogeneity of hazards,the collapses and landslides along the Wenchuan-Lixian section in the Wenchuan-Maerkang Expressway were studied.By using the K-means algorithm,the hazard-threaten objects(people and property)and risk degree(damaged house area and damaged road length)in the study area were spatially clustered,and different clustering attributes were assigned to the study area.Then,nine factors including slope angle,elevation,slope aspect,curvature,surface cutting degree,river curvature coefficient,distance from the tectonic zone,bank slope structure,and formation lithology were selected in terms of hydrology,geology,and geomorphic conditions.The samples were divided into 70%training data and 30%test data.The performance of the K-RF model and the traditional random forest(RF)model in susceptibility assessment was compared to provide theoretical support for operation safety and hazard prevention of expressways.The results show that the K-RF model contains a total of 82.95%of the hazard points in the areas with extremely high susceptibility,which has better assessment results than the single RF model(with AUC value increased by 5.4%).Therefore,it is feasible to use clustering to solve the spatial heterogeneity of hazards.However,the research limitation is that it fails to reflect the spatial heterogeneity of hazards from the hazard itself.The coupled model is a comprehensive reflection of susceptibility and vulnerability in essence.
分 类 号:X43[环境科学与工程—灾害防治]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7