3M Sof-Lex^(TM)、EVE DIAPRO及道邦玻璃陶瓷对IPS e.max CAD全瓷修复体抛光效果的对比  

Comparative of the Polishing Effect of 3M Sof-Lex^(TM),EVE DIAPRO and TobooM glass-ceramic on IPS e.max CAD All-ceramic Restorations

作　　者：付曼 裴飞 李爱芹 陈卓 FU Man;PEI Fei;LI Aiqin(Department of Stomatology,Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University,Henan 450000,China)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学附属郑州中心医院口腔科,450000

出　　处：《医学研究杂志》2025年第3期120-125,共6页Journal of Medical Research

基　　金：河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目(LHGJ20191047)。

摘　　要：目的比较3M Sof-Lex^(TM)、EVE DIAPRO及道邦玻璃陶瓷3种抛光套装工具对IPS e.max CAD全瓷修复体抛光效果的影响。方法选取临床修复材料IPS e.max CAD玻璃陶瓷制作修复体120个,按表面处理方法分成4组:3M组(采用3M Sof-Lex^(TM)抛光套装)、EVE组(采用EVE DIAPRO抛光套装)、Tob组(采用道邦玻璃陶瓷抛光)及对照组(常规上釉处理),每组30个修复体。比较处理后各组的表面粗糙度、光泽度、维氏硬度、断裂韧性、细菌黏附量、色素沉着情况、挠曲强度及牙釉质磨损程度。结果各组维氏硬度比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);轮廓算数平均偏差(Ra值)从低到高依次为对照组<3M组3M组>EVE组>Tob组,挠曲强度从高到低依次为3M组>对照组>EVE组>Tob组,体积损失量从高到低依次为对照组>Tob组>EVE组>3M组;光泽度、△E值、细菌黏附量、体积损失量各组间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P<0.05),Ra值、Rz值、断裂韧性等3M组与对照组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),与EVE组、Tob组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论不同抛光处理均能降低IPS e.max CAD全瓷表面粗糙度、细菌黏附量、色素沉着情况及牙釉质磨损程度,提高光泽度、断裂韧性及挠曲强度,其中3M Sof-Lex^(TM)抛光套装综合效果最佳,与上釉效果相似。Objective To compare the effects of 3M Sof-Lex^(TM),EVE DIAPRO and TobooM glass-ceramic polishing kits on the polishing of IPS e.max CAD all-ceramic restorations.Methods A total of 120specimens of IPS e.max CAD glass-ceramic restorations were selected and divided into 4groups according to the surface treatment method:3M group(3M Sof-Lex^(TM)polishing kit),EVE group(EVE DIAPRO polishing kit),Tob group(TobooM glass-ceramic polishing)and the control group(conventional glazing treatment),30specimens in each group.Surface roughness,gloss,Vickers hardness,fracture toughness,bacterial adhesion,pigmentation,flexural strength and degree of enamel wear were compared between the groups after treatment.Results There was no significant difference in Vickers hardness among the groups(P>0.05);the mean deviation of contour arithmetic(Ra value)from low to high in order of control group<3M group<Tob group<EVE group in descending order,the amount of bacterial adherence,the mean height of unevenness(Rz value),and the value of colour difference(△E value)from low to high in order of control group<3M group<EVE group<Tob group in descending order,and glossiness and fracture toughness from high to low in order of control group>3M group>EVE group>Tob group,flexural strength from high to low in order of 3M group>control group>EVE group>Tob group,volume loss from high to low in order of control group>Tob group>EVE group>3M group,there were no statistically significant differences in gloss,△E value,bacterial adhesion,volume loss among groups(P<0.05),there were no statistically significant differences in Ra value,Rz value,fracture toughness between 3M group and control group(P>0.05),and differed significantly from the EVE group and Tob group(P<0.05).Conclusion Different polishing treatments can reduce IPS e.max CAD all-ceramic surface roughness,the amount of bacterial adhesion,pigmentation and enamel abrasion,and improve gloss,fracture toughness and flexural strength,of which the 3M Sof-Lex^(TM)polishing set has the best overall effect,si

关 键 词：3M Sof-Lex^(TM) EVE DIAPRO 道邦玻璃陶瓷 IPS e.max CAD全瓷 抛光效果 

分 类 号：R783.1[医药卫生—口腔医学]