民国社会文化理论的双重维度:主体性构建与本土性嬗变  

Dual Dimensions of Republican China’s Sociocultural Theory:Construction of Subjectivity and Evolution of Localization

作　　者：葛静波 GE Jingbo

机构地区：[1]首都师范大学历史学院,北京100048

出　　处：《北华大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期38-46,152,共10页Journal of Beihua University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“近代中国婚姻制度体系化研究”(24BZS076)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：探索社会生活与其内在观念之间关系是社会文化史研究的重要范畴之一。20世纪初,伴随着全面而深刻的社会变革,“社会文化”概念应运而生,形成一套完整的理论建构体系,并积累经典的学术研究案例。“社会文化”主要指涵盖科教文卫、家庭、性伦等方面的大众文化事业,兼具“文化主体性”与“文化本土性”两大特征。社会学家余天休通过“社会-文化”互动视角,运用社会学方法研究大众文化问题,揭示文化现象背后的社会历史脉络,推动社会文化研究。回溯民国时期“社会文化”的理论研究过程,可以丰富社会文化史学科的学术话语体系,为社会文化史的理论探索提供现代启示。Exploring the relationship between social life and its internal concepts is one of the important categories in the study of social and cultural history.At the beginning of the 20th century,with comprehensive and profound social changes,the concept of“Social culture”emerged,forming a complete theoretical construction system and accumulating classic academic research cases.“Social culture”mainly refers to the mass cultural undertakings that cover science,education,culture,health,family,sexual ethics,and other aspects,with both the characteristics of“cultural subjectivity”and“cultural locality”.Sociologist Yu Tianxiu uses the perspective of“social cultural”interaction and sociological methods to study popular cultural issues,reveals the social and historical context behind cultural phenomena,and promotes social and cultural research.Tracing back to the theoretical research process of“social culture”during the Republic of China period can enrich the academic discourse system of the discipline of social and cultural history,and provide modern inspiration for the theoretical exploration of social and cultural history.

关 键 词：民国时期 社会文化理论 文化主体性 文化本土性 余天休 

分 类 号：K25[历史地理—历史学]