检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谌锦华 Shen Jinhua(Law School,Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China)
出 处:《锦州医科大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期32-37,共6页Journal of Jinzhou Medical University(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:诉讼机制作为医疗纠纷的解决机制之一,对妥善化解医疗纠纷、保障医患双方合法权益、维护医药行业健康发展具有重要作用。但现行的医疗纠纷诉讼解决机制主要是以现代医学西医为主,缺乏对传统中医的考虑,加之诉讼机制正面临较为严重的“人案矛盾”。由此衍生出中医医疗纠纷界定不清晰、中医医疗损害鉴定适用混乱以及中医医疗纠纷诉讼解决机制超负荷等问题。为此,我们有必要从明晰中医医疗损害纠纷具体界定,厘正中医医疗损害鉴定适用,优化中医医疗纠纷解决机制等方面来疏解中医医疗纠纷诉讼解决机制存在的问题。As one of the medical dispute resolution mechanisms,litigation mechanism plays an important role in properly resolving medical disputes,protecting the legitimate rights and interests of both doctors and patients,and maintaining the healthy development of the pharmaceutical industry.However,the current medical dispute litigation resolution mechanism is mainly based on modern medicine and Western medicine,and lacks the consideration of traditional Chinese medicine.In addition,the litigation mechanism is facing serious“contradictions in human cases”,resulting in the unclear definition of TCM medical disputes,the chaotic application of medical damage identification and the overload of TCM medical dispute litigation resolution mechanism.Therefore,it is necessary to clarify the specific definition of TCM medical injury disputes,correct the application of TCM medical injury identification,and optimize the mechanism of TCM medical dispute resolution to resolve the problems existing in the mechanism of TCM medical dispute litigation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7