检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘师宏 余慧青 杨列军 王思雄 Liu Shi-hong;Yu Hui-qing;Yang Lie-jun;Wang Si-xiong
机构地区:[1]重庆大学附属肿瘤医院老年肿瘤科
出 处:《中国医学人文》2025年第2期37-41,共5页Chinese Medical Humanities
基 金:重庆市社会科学规划项目项目编号:2022PY31;重庆市科卫联合医学科研项目项目编号:2023QNXM018;重庆市沙坪坝区技术创新项目项目编号:2024137;重庆市高等教育教学改革研究项目项目编号:233022。
摘 要:目的探讨对癌症晚期患者进行反向临终关怀照护的效果。方法抽选2023年5月—2024年4月在本院住院的晚期肺癌患者60人。以随机分组方式将患者分成两组,观察组30人,对照组30人。两组均给予常规诊疗和照护,观察组则引入反向临终关怀的个性化宣教。比较两组患者的生活质量评分。结果干预后观察组的肺癌治疗功能评价量表(functional assessment of cancer therapy-lung,FACT-L)得分为(123±1.6)分,优于对照组的(112.6±1.2)分(P<0.05);肺癌症状量表(lung cancer symptom scale,LCSS)和实验结果指数(trial outcome index,TOI)得分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论反向临终关怀在晚期肺癌患者中有较为显著的应用价值,值得推广。Objective To explore the effects of reverse hospice care on terminal cancer patients.Methods Sixty patients with advanced lung cancer hospitalized in our hospital from May 2023 to April 2024 were selected.They were randomly divided into two groups:an observation group(30 patients)and a control group(30 patients).Both groups received routine diagnosis,treatment,and care,while the observation group additionally underwent personalized education incorporating reverse hospice care.Quality of life scores were compared between the two groups.Results After the intervention,the functional assessment of cancer therpy-lung(FACT-L)score in the observation group was(123±1.6),which was better than that in the control group(112.6±1.2)(P<0.05).The scores of the lung cancer symptom scale(LCSS)and trial outcome index(TOI)in the observation group were also higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Reverse hospice care demonstrates significant application value for terminal cancer patients and is worthy of promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7