检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张晓婉 ZHANG Xiaowan
出 处:《台湾研究集刊》2025年第2期111-125,共15页Taiwan Research Journal
基 金:2021年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“战后台湾文学理论的审美秩序建构研究(1950-1959)”(21YJC751036)。
摘 要:推行民族标准语与恢复祖国语言文化是台湾地区光复后文化重建工作的重点。小学语文教育在其中占有重要位置。直接教学法是台湾小学语文教育方法之一,光复初期就已计划施行。1950年代,在王玉川、祁致贤等语文教育工作负责人指导下,岛内开展直接教学法的实验工作,并最终将其确定为台湾小学低年级语文教学法。直接教学法承接内地语文教育经验,是“再祖国化”的民族语言复原工作的积极探索。此外,直接教学法在实际推行中的现实必要性及其局限性,需要回到历史语境中加以正确看待与理解。The“National Language Movement”was a central focus of Chinese cultural reconstruction efforts following Taiwan's Retrocession.Primary school education played an important role in promoting the use of standard Chinese.Proposed in the early post-Retrocession period,the Direct Teaching Method was a key pedagogical approach in primary school standard Chinese education.In the 1950s,Wang Yuchuan and Qi Zhixian,standing members of the“National Language Promotion Committee of Taiwan”,spearheaded experimental implementations of the Direct Teaching Method.This ultimately led to its adoption as the official teaching method for standard Chinese education in Taiwan's primary schools.Rooted in Chinese mainland's language education,the Direct Teaching Method represented a significant effort to restore national language.Furthermore,the method's limitations and practical necessity must be properly understood within their historical context.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7