检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李献庆 田晓伟[2] 石猛 LI Xianqing;TIAN Xiaowei;SHI Meng(College of education,Shandong Women’s University,Jinan 250300,Shandong,China;Faculty of Education,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China)
机构地区:[1]山东女子学院教育学院,山东济南250300 [2]西南大学教育学部,重庆400715
出 处:《复旦教育论坛》2025年第1期16-22,共7页Fudan Education Forum
基 金:教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目“铸牢中华民族共同体意识教育政策研究”(22JJD880037)。
摘 要:学术史梳理、文献综述和知识谱系构架三者共担了强化学术规范和延承学术知识的责任。教育研究中存在着学术史、文献综述和知识谱系混用与误用的问题,破解这些问题需要澄清三者的内在一致性,洞见它们在研究目标、思想性与表现形式方面的差异性。对教育研究来说,廓清学术史、文献综述和知识谱系的关系图景,不仅能帮助研究者鉴别研究问题,建构自我学术身份,实现学术的具身对话,而且有助于研究者参照知识地图,找寻解决问题的进路,从而凸显文献研究的功能和作用,提升教育研究的品质。The academic history of education,literature review,and knowledge genealogy collectively contribute to shaping academic norms and ensuring the continuity of scholarly knowledge.However,in educational research,these three concepts are often conflated or misused.Addressing this issue requires clarifying their intrinsic consistency while recognizing their differences in research objectives,intellectual orientation,and modes of presentation.A clear delineation of the relationship among academic history,literature review,and knowledge genealogy in educational research can assist scholars in identifying research questions,constructing their academic identities,and engaging in embodied academic dialogue.Moreover,it enables researchers to navigate the knowledge landscape,seek effective problem-solving approaches,and ultimately highlight the significance and utility of literature research,thereby enhancing the quality of educational research.
分 类 号:G40-03[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7