重罪案件认罪认罚从宽制度的司法检视与破解路径  

Judicial Review and Solutions to the Leniency System for Guilty Pleas in Felony Cases

作　　者：郭虹 陈晓丽 刘建菲 Guo Hong;Chen Xiaoli;Liu Jianfei(Yili Normal University,Yining Xinjiang 835000;People’s Procuratorate of Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture,Yining Xinjiang 835000)

机构地区：[1]伊犁师范大学,新疆伊宁835000 [2]伊犁哈萨克自治州人民检察院,新疆伊宁835000

出　　处：《安徽警官职业学院学报》2025年第1期55-60,共6页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers

基　　金：2023年度伊犁师范大学校级科研项目“刑法预防功能的扩张及其合理限度研究”(2023YSYB034)。

摘　　要：重罪案件并非认罪认罚从宽制度的“禁区”。谦抑性理论、人身危险性降低理论、程序主体性理论是重罪案件认罪认罚从宽制度的理论基础。审视运行现状,存在适用效果待提升、侦诉审程序偏离、量刑建议精确性不足、被害人参与权保障不彰、与刑事和解制度衔接缺失等困境。应优化适用率,纠偏侦诉审程序偏离,提高量刑建议的准确性,细化并拓展被害人权益,促进与刑事和解制度的衔接。The leniency system for guilty pleas is not considered a“forbidden zone”in cases involving felonies.Its theoretical underpinnings in such cases encompass the theories of modesty,reduced personal danger,and procedural subjectivity.A review of its current judicial operation reveals several challenges,including the need for enhancement in its application outcomes,deviations within the investigation and trial procedures,insufficient precision in sentencing recommendations,inadequate safeguarding of victims'rights,and a lack of integration between the leniency system for guilty pleas and the criminal reconciliation system.Therefore,measures should be implemented including optimizing the application rate of the leniency system for guilty pleas in serious crime cases,rectifying deviations in the investigation,litigation and trial procedures,improving the precision of sentencing recommendations,refining and expanding the rights of victims,so as to foster the integration between the leniency system for guilty pleas and the criminal reconciliation system.

关 键 词：重罪案件 认罪认罚从宽制度 适用效果 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]