化约与误读:文艺复兴思想转型中的人文主义与经院哲学  

Reduction and Misreading:Humanism and Scholasticism in the Transformation of Renaissance Thought

作　　者：邹博 Zou Bo

机构地区：[1]江西师范大学历史文化与旅游学院,江西南昌330022

出　　处：《外国问题研究》2025年第1期119-132,160,共15页FOREIGN HISTORY STUDIES

摘　　要：19世纪末以来,受布克哈特学说影响,学者们一直强调文艺复兴时期人文主义思潮的现代性,并将其对手经院哲学降格为阻碍历史演进的落后学术形态。然而,如果结合学术史的流变,细致厘清人文主义、经院主义的知识谱系与思想脉络,则不难发现,其中存在着人文主义被“化约”、经院哲学被“误读”的现象。被视为现代思想源流的人文主义,虽孕育了一种尚处于萌芽状态的人欲观,但本质上仍是基于古典中世纪传统的调试渐变。经院哲学也不应单纯地视为被谴责、被弃置的对象,在时代变革的重要节点,它依旧发挥了积极作用。解决文艺复兴思想转型中的复杂纠葛,必须灵活处置两种学术形态之间的碰撞与融合,才能得出更为全面的结论。Since the late 19^(th)century,influenced by the Burckhardtian tradition,scholars have consistently emphasized the modernity of the humanist movement during the Renaissance,often relegating its rival,Scholasticism,to the status of a regressive academic form that hindered historical progress.However,when we closely examine the evolution of intellectual history and clarify the knowledge structures and intellectual lineages of both Humanism and Scholasticism,it becomes evident that Humanism has often been“reduced”and Scholasticism“misinterpreted.”Although Humanism,viewed as the source of modern thought,nurtured an emerging view of human desire,it was fundamentally a gradual adaptation within the classical medieval tradition.Scholasticism should not simply be seen as something to be condemned or discarded;it played an active role at crucial points of historical transformation.To analyze the transformation of Renaissance thought comprehensively and convincingly,it is essential to recognize the interplay and fusion of these two intellectual traditions.

关 键 词：文艺复兴 人文主义 经院哲学 思想转型 

分 类 号：B503[哲学宗教—外国哲学]