我国审查逮捕程序诉讼化的反思与整体进路  

Reflection and Comprehensive Approach of Procedure of Examining Arrest in Litigation in Our Country

作　　者：陈海锋[1] Chen Haifeng

机构地区：[1]上海社会科学院法学研究所

出　　处：《法学》2025年第3期142-157,共16页Law Science

基　　金：2024年国家社会科学基金一般项目“范式转换视角下刑事审前程序与审判程序的衔接研究”(项目批准号:24BFX130)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：刑事审前程序的“高羁押率”对被追诉人的权利保障产生了不利影响,审查逮捕程序的诉讼化因此被视为改革的重要方向,但不应忽视现行程序在司法公正、诉讼效率与实践效果方面的积极价值。审查逮捕程序的诉讼化改革应避免“全面化”、“只能由法官主持”和“作为消解高羁押率的措施”等误区。审查逮捕程序无论是否诉讼化,完善的核心都是加强社会危险性的证明、完善辩护权利的保障和强化检察机关的中立地位。在大部分案件继续沿用现行逮捕审查程序基础上,通过在案件范围、审查时间和审查形式三个方面对该程序进行有限的诉讼化改造,辅之以救济程序的完全诉讼化,可以作为我国审查逮捕制度改革的整体路径。The high rate of detention in pretrial procedure has an adverse impact on the protection of the rights of the accused,and the litigation of arrest procedures is therefore regarded as an important direction of reform.However,the positive values of the current arrest procedures in judicial justice,litigation efficiency and practical effect should not be ignored.At the same time,this reform should also avoid the misunderstanding that it is comprehensive litigation,can only be presided over by judges,and is used as a measure to eliminate the high detention rate.Regardless of whether the arrest procedure is litigated or not,the core of its improvement is to strengthen the proof of danger to society,improve the right to defense,and strengthen the neutral status of the procuratorate.On the basis of continuing to follow the current procedures for most cases,the limited litigation of the arrest procedure in three aspects:the scope of the case,the time of review,and the form of review,supplemented by the complete litigation of the relief procedure,can be used as a way to realize the overall governance of the arrest issue in China.

关 键 词：审查逮捕程序 诉讼化改造 人权保障 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]