检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈爱武[1,2] CHEN Aiwu
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学法学院 [2]中国法治现代化研究院
出 处:《中国政法大学学报》2025年第2期108-120,共13页Journal Of CUPL
摘 要:我国解决家事纠纷的程序一直附随在民事诉讼程序之中,随着民事诉讼模式从职权主义向当事人主义转变,一元化的民事诉讼程序越来越难以满足家事纠纷的解决需求,故而在家事审判方式和工作机制改革后,理论界和实务界达成的基本共识是尽快制定家事诉讼法。从立法技术上看,我国既可以制定专门的家事诉讼法典,也可以在民事诉讼法典化的进程中将家事诉讼作为其中一编予以安置。从立法的结构和内容上看,家事诉讼可以参照我国台湾地区做法,对家事案件进行统合立法,并就家事诉讼、非讼、调解、执行等分别妥为建构。The procedure of solving family disputes in China has always been attached to the civil litigation procedure.With the change of civil litigation mode from inquisitorial system to adversarial system,the centralized civil litigation procedure is increasingly difficult to meet the needs of solving family disputes.Therefore,after the reform of family trial methods and working mechanisms,the basic consensus between theory and practice is to formulate family litigation law as soon as possible.From the perspective of legislative techniques China can not only formulate a special family litigation code,but also arrange family litigation as a separate part in the codification of civil procedure law.From the perspective of the structure and content of legislation,family litigation can refer to the practice in Taiwan,China,carry out integrated legislation on family cases,and construct family litigation,non-litigation,mediation and execution respectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49