数字艺术有灵韵吗?——在人工智能时代重新理解本雅明  

Does Digital Art Have Aura?——Reinterpreting Benjamin in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

作　　者：常江 王茜 CHANG Jiang;WANG Xi(School of Communication,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060,Guangdong,China;Global Communication Institute,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060,Guangdong,China)

机构地区：[1]深圳大学传播学院,广东深圳518060 [2]深圳大学全球传播研究院,广东深圳518060

出　　处：《韶关学院学报》2025年第3期1-9,F0002,共10页Journal of Shaoguan University

摘　　要：基于对“灵韵”这一经典概念的历史性回顾,强调灵韵的人文主义意涵对于反思当下的技术文化境况具有重要的价值论和认识论意义。在人工智能时代,数字艺术进入了蓬勃发展的状态,机器逻辑的“去物质化”“生成性”“离身性”等特征侵蚀并消解着灵韵的内核——其原真性意义和灵韵式感知所依附的物质性存续、历史见证以及具身经验的在场。面对人、艺术和技术深度交缠的“后人类状况”和人机关系的结构性失衡,人文灵韵的复归在于把握和协调人与机器之间的共生关系,一条关键路径便是在艺术创造、互动和感知的过程中重建人与机器的批判性距离,展开对机器异化并消解主体经验的批判性反思和抵抗行动。Based on a historical review of the concept of“aura,”this paper emphasizes the significant axiological and epistemological implications of its humanistic connotations for reflecting on contemporary techno-cultural conditions.In the age of Artificial Intelligence,the media logic characterized by dematerialization,generativity,and disembodiment has progressively eroded the core of“aura”:the material existence that its authentic meaning and auratic perception rely on,historical testimony and embodied presence.Confronted with the intricate interplay among humans,art,and technology,as well as a structural imbalance in human–machine relations,the revival of humanistic aura hinges on reconciling the symbiotic relationship between humans and machines.A key approach lies in reestablishing a critical distance between them during artistic creation,interaction,and perception,thereby enabling the critical reflection on and the resistance against the machine-induced alienation and disintegration of subjectivity.

关 键 词：灵韵 本雅明 人工智能 数字艺术 媒介化 

分 类 号：J0-05[艺术—艺术理论]