《诗品》中评价陆机“不贵绮错”条考释  

The Philological Studies of the Comment in Shi Pin About Lu Ji

作　　者：周杰 孙小梅[1] ZHOU Jie;SUN Xiao-mei(School of Chinese Literature,Shanxi Datong University,Datong Shanxi,037009)

机构地区：[1]山西大同大学文学院,山西大同037009

出　　处：《山西大同大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期77-80,114,共5页Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：《诗品》陆机条“尚规矩,不贵绮错,有伤直致之奇”“,不贵绮错”一语难解。目前学界主流观点认为此条语义矛盾,认为“不”字或为妄加,或为误刻,或为衍误,或为无实义,然皆难成定论。今考众人之说以作新辨,认为在“不贵绮错”无误的前提下,此句可解作“尚规矩,不欲绮错,有伤直致,以之为奇”“。然其咀嚼英华,厌饫膏泽”是相对“不贵绮错”而言,总体上是对陆机五言诗的文采以及文质并重、形式创新的肯定之语。The Poem Evaluation has a comment about Lu Ji’poetry style.It is“Observed the poem-writing rules and refuse to be intricate with flowery language,as well as own it’s characteristic by opposing to a kind of poetry style which is simple and unadorned”and there are many commentates about“refuse to be intricate with flowery languages”.According to mainstream opinions,it should be interpreted as“Observed the poem-writing rules but highly praise flowery language so that breach the beauty of poem called“simple and unadorned”while they cannot put convincing materials such as version basis.So it is always difficult to draw a conclusion.This article put a new analysis about this comment refer to other’s opinions.This comment is actually a commendation for Lu Ji’s pomes.

关 键 词：《诗品》 陆机 规矩 不贵绮错 直致 

分 类 号：I222[文学—中国文学]