检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹美 陈段段 杨海波[1,3] Cao Mei;Chen Duanduan;Yang Haibo(School of Psychology,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin,300387;School of Translation,Qufu Normal University,Rizhao,276826;Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students'Mental Development and Learning,Tianjin,300387)
机构地区:[1]天津师范大学心理学部,天津300387 [2]曲阜师范大学翻译学院,日照276826 [3]学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室,天津300387
出 处:《心理科学》2025年第2期346-358,共13页Journal of Psychological Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(32271140)的资助。
摘 要:研究探究问题性社交网络使用个体和正常使用个体对社交信息注意偏向的特异性加工模式。实验1通过点探测任务探讨问题性社交网络使用个体对社交信息的注意偏向行为特点,实验2结合点探测任务和眼动追踪技术,进一步探索问题性社交网络使用个体对社交信息注意偏向的视觉变化进程和注视模式。结果显示,问题性社交网络使用个体在平均朝向分数、凝视时间、总注视时间和注视比率上均显著高于正常使用个体;早期和晚期眼动指标分析表明,问题性社交网络使用个体对社交信息的注意偏向具有特异性,表现为警觉-维持模式。Existing research has shown that there is an interactive effect between the subjective perception of context and the cognitive response to specific cues in individuals with addiction(Brand et al.,2016;Brand et al.,2019).Regarding this interaction,the dual-process theory(Bechara,2005)posits that addictive behaviors result from the competition and restraint between an individual's automated impulsive processes and controlled reflective processes.In the occurrence of addictive behaviors,attentional bias is an external manifestation of an individual's cognitive response to specific cues,primarily driven by impulsive rather than rational thinking(Bechara,2005).This bias makes individuals more sensitive to relevant stimuli in social networks,granting these stimuli greater processing priority and affecting attention allocation(Nikolaidou et al.,2019),which further reinforces the attentional bias(Brand et al.,2016;Brand et al.,2019).In this cyclical process,it increases the individual's craving for these cues,leading to problematic social media use(Kuss&Griffiths,2017).This includes attention bias towards addiction-related stimuli(Brand et al.,2019;Brand et al.,2016).The inconsistencies observed in the research may stem from differences in the priority of social network information,meaning that there are varying strengths of cues related to social networks,with higher-priority cues being more likely to produce attentional bias(Field&Franken,2014).Furthermore,internet addiction should be specified as an addiction to content rather than the medium itself(Starcevic,2013),a phenomenon that has been validated in the context of smartphone use(Montag et al.,2019;Panova&Carbonell,2018),and the same applies to problematic social media use.Therefore,social information within social network content has a higher priority compared to the social medium(including social media app icons or vocabulary related to social networks).This study aimed to investigate the distinctive attentional biases towards social information among college st
分 类 号:B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49