检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李金铠 李瑞香 魏伟 LI Jinkai;LI Ruixiang;WEI Wei(School of Economics,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081,China;Luowa Township People’s Government,Pengyang County,Guyuan 756000,China;School of Management,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China;Innovation Center for Discipline Construction of Public Administration,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
机构地区:[1]北京理工大学经济学院,北京100081 [2]彭阳县罗洼乡人民政府,宁夏固原756000 [3]郑州大学管理学院,郑州450001 [4]郑州大学公共管理学学科建设创新中心,郑州450001
出 处:《地域研究与开发》2025年第2期122-128,共7页Areal Research and Development
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目(21&ZD108);河南省高校哲学社会科学应用研究重大项目(2023-YYZD-21)。
摘 要:以民族地区16个国家乡村振兴示范县为研究对象,构建民族地区乡村振兴水平评价指标体系,并使用数据包络分析方法进行测算;在此基础上,采用模糊集定性比较分析法(fsQCA),从组态视角对民族地区实现乡村振兴的旅游因素及路径进行深入分析和探究。结果表明:(1)民族地区示范县的乡村振兴水平整体较高,柳州市鱼峰区的乡村振兴水平最高,博乐市(1.177)、青铜峡市(1.125)的乡村振兴水平处于最低等级;(2)单个旅游因素并不是构成高水平乡村振兴发展的必要条件,多个旅游因素的组合才能高效促进乡村振兴,且乡村振兴旅游作用路径各异,研究共得到3条代表性的乡村振兴旅游路径:活力迸发型、资源驱动型和区位辐射型;(3)民族地区乡村旅游发展受限的主要因素在于旅游区位的缺失,在缺少旅游区位的情况下,即使有经济收入和资金支持,也不能带来高效的乡村振兴发展。Taking the 16 national rural revitalization demonstration counties in ethnic areas as research objects,constructed an evaluation index system for the level of rural revitalization in ethnic areas and measured it using data envelopment analysis;on this basis,used fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis(fsQCA)to conduct an in-depth analysis and exploration of tourism factors and paths for achieving rural revitalization in ethnic areas from a group perspective.The results show that:(1)The overall level of rural revitalization in the demonstration counties in ethnic areas is high,with the highest level of rural revitalization in Yufeng District of Liuzhou City,and the lowest level of rural revitalization in Bole City(1.177)and Qingtongxia City(1.125);(2)Individual tourism factors do not constitute the necessary conditions for the development of high-level rural revitalization,and the combination of multiple tourism factors can efficiently promote rural revitalization,and rural revitalization tourism paths vary,the study obtained a total of three representative rural revitalization tourism paths:vitality burst,resource-driven and location radiation;(3)The main factor that limits the development of rural tourism in ethnic areas lies in the lack of tourism location,under the absence of tourism location,even if there is economic income and financial support,it cannot bring efficient rural revitalization development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7