新兴权利的可证成性及其证成模式  

The Justification and Justifying Mode of Emerging Rights

作　　者：王德新[1] WANG De-xin(Shandong Normal University,Jinan 250358,China)

机构地区：[1]山东师范大学,济南250358

出　　处：《云南大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期114-124,共11页The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：山东省社科规划项目“山东省民事诉讼率变迁与社会治理创新研究”(项目号:24CFZJ23)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：21世纪以来生育权、祭奠权、贞操权、形象权、虚拟财产权等新兴权利纠纷不断涌入司法渠道,立法机关也不断通过法律立改废活动创设新的权利类型,有必要对权利的生长现象和证成活动作出理论回应。从权利发展史看,任何一种成熟的权利形态都曾经历作为新兴权利的生长发育阶段。新兴权利的本质是有待证成的可受法律保护的正当利益,具有“非法定性”“过程发育性”和“可证成性”。新兴权利的证成有立法证成和司法证成两种模式,其中司法证成是实践中更为常见但结果难以预测的证成模式。为促进权利的有序生长,既要保障新兴权利诉求进入司法渠道的顺畅性,也要设置必要的限制规则以防范权利的泛化。Emerging rights disputes such as reproductive rights,sacrificial rights,chastity rights,image rights,and virtual property rights continue to flood the judicial channels,and legislative bodies are also constantly creating new types of rights through legal reforms and abolition activities.It is necessary to make theoretical responses to the phenomenon of the growth of rights.From the history of the development of rights,any mature form of rights has gone through a development stage as an emerging right.The essence of emerging rights is the legitimate interests that are yet to be justified and can be protected by law,with“non-statutory”,“process-based developmental nature”,and“justifiable nature”.There are two modes of justifying emerging rights:justified by legislature and justified by judiciary,of which the latter is the more common in practice but it is difficult to predict the results.To promote the orderly growth of rights,it is necessary to ensure the smooth entry of emerging rights claims into judicial channels,as well as to establish necessary restrictive rules to prevent the generalization of rights.

关 键 词：新兴权利 立法证成 司法证成 权利泛化 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]