检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周德 金凤芝[1,2] 李思媛 李欢 李普 ZHOU De;JIN Fengzhi;LI Siyuan;LI Huan;LI Pu(School of Public Affairs,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,China;Collaborative Innovation Center for Computational Social Sciences,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,China;Collaborative Innovation Center of Statistical Data Engineering Technology&Application,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江工商大学公共管理学院,浙江杭州310018 [2]浙江工商大学计算社会科学协同创新中心,浙江杭州310018 [3]浙江工商大学统计数据工程技术与应用协同创新中心,浙江杭州310018
出 处:《中国土地科学》2025年第2期23-32,共10页China Land Science
基 金:浙江省属高校基本业务费专项资金资助(XT202310);国家社会科学基金项目(19BGL283);浙江工商大学“数字+”学科建设管理项目(SZJ2022B007,SZJ2022B005)。
摘 要:研究目的:分析浙江省、市级层面74份乡村振兴产业用地政策文本,构建政策工具谱系,解析政策工具选择偏好与优化路径,为完善乡村振兴产业用地政策提供参考。研究方法:扎根理论的质性研究方法。研究结果:(1)乡村振兴产业用地政策工具耦合了目标导向型、过程控制型、行为引导型和能力建设型4类政策工具;(2)过程控制型政策工具和目标导向型政策工具运用过多,行为引导型政策工具和能力建设型政策工具需加强;(3)政策工具运用层面存在政策工具结构亟需优化、政策工具运用协调性尚待强化、政策工具可操作性亟待增强、政策的衔接性有待提升等问题。研究结论:未来应优化政策工具使用结构、重视用地政策全生命周期管理、强化政策内容分解与细化政策工具操作流程、加强政策的协调配合水平等。The purposes of this paper are to analyze 74 rural revitalization industrial land use policy texts issued at the provincial and municipal levels in Zhejiang Province,to construct a pedigree of policy instruments,to analyze the preference characteristics and optimization paths of policy tools,and to provide the reference for policy and institution optimization.The research method is qualitative research based on grounded theory.The research results show that:1)the policy tools of industrial land use for rural revitalization are coupled with four types of policy tools,including goal-oriented,process control,behavior-oriented and capacity-building.2)Process control and goal-oriented policy tools are used excessively,and behavior-oriented and capacity-building policy tools need to be strengthened.3)At the level of policy tool application,there are some problems,such as the urgent need to optimize the structure of policy tools,the coordination of policy tool application,the feasibility of policy tools,and the need to improve policy cohesion.In conclusion,it is necessary to optimize the use structure of policy tools,to pay attention to the whole life cycle management of land use policies,to strengthen the decomposition of policy content,to refine the implementation process of policy tools,and to strengthen the level of policy coordination and cooperation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49