功能规范型归责理论及辩护——对虞法、田洁和陆鹏杰的回应  

A Functional Normative Theory of Moral Responsibility and Its Defense:Reply to YU Fa,TIAN Jie,and LU Pengjie

作　　者：刘晓非 余日青 LIU Xiaofei;YU Riqing

机构地区：[1]武汉大学哲学学院

出　　处：《哲学分析》2025年第2期80-91,198,共13页Philosophical Analysis

摘　　要：“功能规范型归责理论”是对属权进路、实用进路、规范进路这三种归责理论的批判整合。它从“功能”视角出发,将归责条件界定为内在于相关实用功能的规范,并主张放弃主流的“自我性”条件而转向“同一性”条件来解释归责所需的控制力,从而更好地处理相容论归责理论所面临的挑战。该理论能够回应虞法、田洁和陆鹏杰从否决功能、“替罪羊反驳”、前瞻式归责概念和自然主义预设等角度所提出的批评。The functional normative theory of moral responsibility is a critical integration of the three approaches:the ownership approach,the pragmatic approach,and the normative approach.Starting from a“functional”perspective,it defines the conditions for moral responsibility as norms inherent in the relevant pragmatic functions.It advocates for abandoning the mainstream“self-ownership”condition and turning to the“identity-individuation”condition to explain the control required for moral responsibility,thereby better addressing the challenges faced by compatibilism.This theory is able to respond to criticisms raised by Yu Fa,Tian Jie,and Lu Pengjie from various angles such as the veto function,the“scapegoat objection,”the forwardlooking type of responsibility,and the naturalistic presupposition.

关 键 词：道德责任 功能规范型归责理论 回应性态度 自我性 同一性 

分 类 号：B82[哲学宗教—伦理学]