认罪协商程序中的证据开示路径构建  

Construction of Evidence Discovery Path in Plea Negotiation Procedure

作　　者：王双双 WANG Shuangshuang(School of Law,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu 241000,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学法学院,安徽芜湖241000

出　　处：《东莞理工学院学报》2025年第2期44-52,共9页Journal of Dongguan University of Technology

摘　　要：认罪认罚从宽制度的全面推行,推动了我国刑事诉讼格局由对抗转向协商的进程。与对抗制诉讼模式之下证据开示的传统价值相比,控辩协商视域下,证据开示又衍生出具体的新价值。在域外,具有协商程序的国家,均实行相应的证据开示制度,而我国具有协商基因的认罪认罚从宽制度自正式入法至今已六年有余,应与之相配套的证据开示制度不仅缺失立法层面的明确、详细之规定,实践运用效果更是不佳。因此,为弥合控辩双方证据信息差距,实现认罪协商之程序公正的基本要求,亟须从模式选择、程序启动、参加主体、开示阶段、开示范围、开示方式以及救济措施等方面来构建我国控辩协商程序中的证据开示具体路径。The comprehensive implementation of the system of leniency of guilty plea promotes the process of the pattern of criminal procedure in our country from confrontation to consultation.Compared with the traditional value of evidence discovery under the adversarial litigation mode,evidence discovery has derived specific new value from the perspective of prosecution and defense negotiation.Outside the region,countries with negotiation procedures have implemented the corresponding evidence discovery system,but China’s plea leniency system with negotiation gene has been officially entered into the law for more than six years,and the evidence discovery system that should be matched with it not only lacks clear and detailed provisions at the legislative level,but also has poor effect in practice.Therefore,in order to bridge the gap of evidence information between the prosecution and the defense and realize the basic requirement of procedural justice in plea negotiation,it is urgent to construct the concrete evidence discovery in our prosecution and defense negotiation process from the aspects of mode selection,procedure initiation,participants,disclosure stage,scope of disclosure,disclosure method and relief measures.

关 键 词：认罪协商 证据开示 证据知悉 认罪自愿性 路径构建 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]