葛寅亮《大学》诠释对晚明“朱、王之争”的回应  

Ge Yinliang’s Interpretation of The Great Learning as a Response to the“Zhu-Wang Controversy”in the Late Ming Dynasty

作　　者：李敬峰[1] LI Jing-feng

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学哲学学院,陕西西安710119

出　　处：《陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第2期87-95,共9页Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“关中朱子学研究”(23AZX011)。

摘　　要：《大学》是中晚明全国性学术思潮“朱、王之争”的要津所在,故而由《大学》介入和回应“朱、王之争”成为是时学者的学术共法。服膺阳明心学的葛寅亮倾力撰写《大学诂》和《大学湖南讲》来介入“朱、王之争”,在《大学》文本上,他杂糅古本、今本与石经本《大学》来构建“葛氏改本《大学》”,希冀以新的文本来止息朱、王在《大学》文本上的争论;在《大学》义理上,承袭阳明的体用模式来处理“三纲领”的关系,因循朱子来凸显“格物”为《大学》的第一义工夫;在解经方式上,一尊阳明“以心解经”的模式,反对一味地训诂考证。葛寅亮对“朱、王之争”的回应显豁的是“立足阳明、兼取朱子”的学术方案,这不仅有助于革新和完善阳明心学,延续阳明心学的学术生命,使其迟至清代中期那才渐趋无声,亦直接影响清初修正王学学风的形成,为理解经典诠释与学风递变的双向互动提供一个具体而鲜活的个案。The“Controvery between Zhu and Wang involement”was a national academic trend in the late Ming Dynasty,and its key was The Great Learning,so the intervention and response to the“Zhu and Wang Controversy”through The Great Learning became a common research method for scholars of the time.Ge Yinliang of the Wang Yangming School intervened in the dispute between Zhu and Wang by writing Exegesis the Great Learning and Lectures on the are Learning in Hunan.On the text of the The Great Learning,he combined the ancient,modern,and stone-carved versions to construct the“Ge’s Altered Version of the The Great Learning,”hoping to put an end to the controversy between Zhu and Wang over the text of the The Great Learning with a new text.In the doctrine of The Great Learning,the Body and Function model of Yangming is inherited to deal with the relationship of the Three principles,and“investigation of things”is highlighted as the first important work of The Great Learning by following Zhuzhi.In the way of interpreting the scriptures,he followed Yangming’s mode of“interpreting the scriptures with the heart”and opposed to exegetical proofs.Ge Yinliang’s response to the“Controvery between Zhu and Wang”is clearly“based on Yangming and integrating Zhuzhi”.This approach not only helped to innovate and improve Yangming Xinxue,but also continued the academic life of Yangming Xinxue,which slowly declined until the middle of the Qing Dynasty,and also directly affected the formation of the revision of Yangming Xinxue in the early Qing Dynasty,which provided a concrete and vivid case for the understanding of the bidirectional interaction between the interpretation of canonical books and the gradual change of the academic style.

关 键 词：葛寅亮 《大学》 朱、王之争 

分 类 号：B248[哲学宗教—中国哲学]