比较规范方法和TAMC方法检验化妆品中菌落总数  

Comparative Study on the Standard Method and TAMC Method for Total Aerobic Microbial Count in Cosmetics

作　　者：张晓东 陈怡文 骆海朋[1] 崔生辉[1] 李景云[1] ZHANG Xiaodong;CHEN Yiwen;LUO Haipeng;CUI Shenghui;LI Jingyun(National Institutes for Food and Drug Control,Beijing 100050,China)

机构地区：[1]中国食品药品检定研究院,北京100050

出　　处：《香料香精化妆品》2025年第2期111-117,共7页Flavour Fragrance Cosmetics

基　　金：中国食品药品检定研究院关键技术研究基金(编号GJJS-2022-8-5)。

摘　　要：分析比较《化妆品安全技术规范》(2015年版)中的菌落总数检验方法和好氧微生物总数计数法(total aerobic microbial count方法,以下简称TAMC方法)在化妆品检测中的应用。通过对20个菌种进行菌落总数检测,发现2种方法结果一致。对3类化妆品的人工染菌试验结果表明,TAMC方法满足《中华人民共和国药典》(2020年版)的方法适用性要求,而规范方法未能满足。配对t检验表明,TAMC方法在化妆品菌落总数的检测上的效果优于规范方法。The application of total bacterial count test method in the Safety and Technical Standards for Cosmetics(2015 edition)and the total aerobic microbial count method(referred to as the TAMC method)were compared in the detection of cosmetics.By detecting the total number of colonies of 20 strains,the results of the 2 methods were consistent.The experimental results of artificial contamination of 3 types of cosmetics showed that TAMC method met the requirements of Pharmacopeia of the People’s Republic of China(2020 edition),while the standard method failed to meet the requirements.The paired t-test showed that the TAMC method was more effective in detecting the total number of bacterial colonies in cosmetics.

关 键 词：化妆品 菌落总数 TAMC方法 

分 类 号：TQ658[化学工程—精细化工]