史家俪笔:《明史纪事本末》体例新变下史与文的矛盾消解  

The Historian's Parallelistic Writing Style:The Chronicle of Ming History,the Contradiction between History and Literature

作　　者：郑永辉 ZHENG Yong-hui(School of Minnan Culture,Minnan Normal University,Zhangzhou,Fujian 363000,China)

机构地区：[1]闽南师范大学,福建漳州363000

出　　处：《湖北职业技术学院学报》2025年第1期68-73,共6页Journal of Hubei Polytechnic Institute

摘　　要：清初谷应泰所编《明史纪事本末》,沿用宋代袁枢《通鉴纪事本末》的体例而有所新变。史体上,引入纪传体史书如《史记》《晋书》的“某曰”史论;文体上则继承《晋书》“史臣曰”以俪体的方式进行书写。史的性质要求史家对历史事件进行相对客观的叙述,文的修饰和主观抒发则不被允许,《明史纪事本末》体例的新变即消解了这组矛盾。《明史纪事本末》在史的方面“详略得中,首尾秩然”,在文的方面“遣词抑扬,隶事亲切,尤为曲折详尽”,呈现了谷应泰以史才沟通文才的创造性运用。In the beginning of the Ming Dynasty,Gu followed Yuan Shu in the Song Dynasty.In history,the"certain yue"history theory of"Shi Ji"and"historical Chen yue"is written in the form of Li style.The nature of history requires historians to give a relatively objective account of historical events,while the modification and subjective expression of the text are not allowed.The new changes in the style of The Ming History Chronicle dissolve this group of contradictions."Appropriate details,the beginning and the end of the rank"in the aspect of history and"wording,ways of expression and tortuous and detailed description"in the aspect of literature both indicate the creative use of Gu Yingtai to communicate with literary talents.

关 键 词：《明史纪事本末》 纪事本末体 俪体 谷应泰 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]