检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:海中烨 刘宏生 潘旗开[2] 孙梓灵 HAI Zhongye;LIU Hongsheng;PAN Qikai;SUN Ziling(Department of Emergency Surgery(5),the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450000,He’nan,China;ICU,the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450000,He’nan,China)
机构地区:[1]郑州大学第一附属医院急诊外科(5),郑州450000 [2]郑州大学第一附属医院ICU,郑州450000
出 处:《癌症进展》2025年第8期881-884,共4页Oncology Progress
摘 要:目的目的探究基于量化评估策略的干预对急诊结肠癌患者术后恢复的影响。方法方法根据干预方式的不同将88例急诊结肠癌手术患者分为对照组(n=43)和观察组(n=45),对照组患者采用常规干预,观察组患者采用基于量化评估策略的干预。比较两组患者的术后恢复指标、心理状态[焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)]、疼痛程度[视觉模拟评分法(VAS)]、并发症发生情况及满意度[纽卡斯尔护理满意度量表(NSNS)]。结果观察组患者首次排气时间、首次排便时间、首次下床时间及住院时间均短于对照组,并发症总发生率低于对照组,总满意度高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。干预后,两组患者SAS、SDS、VAS评分均低于本组干预前,观察组患者SAS、SDS、VAS评分均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。结论结论基于量化评估策略的干预应用于急诊结肠癌手术患者中,能够促进患者术后恢复,改善心理状态,减轻疼痛,减少并发症,提高满意度。Objective To explore the influence of quantitative assessment strategy-based intervention on postopera-tive recovery in emergency patients with colon cancer.Method A total of 88 emergency patients with colon cancer who underwent surgery were divided into control group(n=43)and observation group(n=45)according to different interven-tion methods.Patients in the control group received conventional intervention,while patients in the observation group re-ceived quantitative assessment strategy-based intervention.Postoperative recovery indicators,psychological state[self-rat-ing anxiety scale(SAS),self-rating depression scale(SDS)],pain degree[visual analogue scale(VAS)],incidence of com-plications and satisfaction[Newcastle satisfaction with nursing scale(NSNS)]were compared between the two groups.Result The first exhaust time,first defecation time,first get out of bed time and hospital stay in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group,the total incidence of complications was lower than that in the control group,and the total satisfaction rate was higher than that in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After intervention,the scores of SAS,SDS and VAS in both groups were lower than those before intervention,and the scores of SAS,SDS and VAS in observation group were lower than those in control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of quantitative assessment strategy-based interven-tion in emergency patients with colon cancer undergoing surgery can promote postoperative recovery,improve psycholog-ical state,relieve pain,reduce complications and increase satisfaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13