检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于业礼 Yu Yeli(Institute of Science,Technology,and Humanities,Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 201203,China)
机构地区:[1]上海中医药大学科技人文研究院,上海201203
出 处:《中华医史杂志》2025年第1期52-57,共6页Chinese Journal of Medical History
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目(17ZDA332);上海中医药大学科技发展基金(人文社科类)(23KFW02)。
摘 要:俄藏敦煌文献Дx17453残卷为《素问》相关写本,既往多认为是传抄王冰次注本《素问》而成。但Дx17453残卷所载内容与王冰次注本《素问》差异较大,值得怀疑。从文献形制及具体内容等方面判断,Дx17453残卷可能是流传于王冰次注本《素问》之前的版本,与王冰次注《素问》所用底本为同一源流。Дx17453残卷形制为梵夹装,可能是抄成于吐蕃占领敦煌时期(786—848),对于考察《素问》一书在宋以前的流行情况提供研究材料。The Dunhuang fragmentДX17453 in Dun Huang Literature in Russia(E Cang Dun Huang Wen Xian),was believed to be a related version of Su Wen.It was previously taken as a version based on the Su Wen annotated by Wang Bing.However,the content ofДX17453 differs from the annotated edition by Wang Bing in terms of format and content.It was found that theДX17453 should be the original version before the annotated edition by Wang Bing,sharing the same original manuscript with the annotated edition by Wang Bing.The format of the fragmentДX17453 took a Tibetan style,which might mean it was produced in the period of the Tibetan regime(786-848).These findings provide references for investigating the popularity of Su Wen before the Song Dynasty.
分 类 号:R221[医药卫生—中医基础理论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49