检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:顾理平[1] 陈言 GU Li-ping;CHEN Yan(School of Journalism and Communication,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210097,China)
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学新闻与传播学院,江苏南京210097
出 处:《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第3期146-155,共10页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“智媒时代公民隐私保护问题研究”(21&ZD324)。
摘 要:现代公民的隐私保护有着强烈的个人自治传统。历史地看,媒介的发展隐喻地推动了个人本位隐私传统的建立,在实践中从“作为隔离的隐私”向“作为控制的隐私”发展。在新的媒介环境中,算法成为新一代主导要素,社会的技术条件、联结关系、权力样态都因此发生了相应变迁,隐私自治的传统路径因而面临多重掣肘。鉴于当前的媒介境况,应当从打破语义连续性、强化信息处理过程的考察、补充对个人的必要支持入手,应对智能时代的信息秩序,探索更能适配当前媒介条件的隐私自治路径。The contemporary framework of public privacy protection upholds a robust tradition of individual autonomy.Throughout history,the evolution of media has metaphorically fostered the establishment of an individual-centered privacy tradition,evolving from“privacy as isolation”to“privacy as control”in practical terms.In the new media ecology,algorithms have emerged as a new generation of dominant factors,leading to corresponding changes in technical conditions,connection relations,and power dynamics within society.Consequently,the traditional approach towards privacy autonomy faces multiple constraints.Considering the current status of media landscape,it is imperative to disrupt semantic continuity by enhancing investigations into information processing and providing necessary support for individuals.This approach will enable us to navigate the information order in this era of intelligence and explore a more suitable path towards privacy autonomy that aligns with present-day media conditions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222