重审海德格尔与胡塞尔的“存在”理解差异——从《时间概念史导论》谈起  

An Examination of the Divergent Conception of"Sein"in Heidegger and Husserl's Philosophies--Critical Analysis Commencing with the Prolegomena Zur Geschichte des Zeitbegrifs

作　　者：齐晓 Qi Xiao

机构地区：[1]复旦大学哲学学院

出　　处：《理论界》2025年第4期48-54,共7页Theory Horizon

基　　金：国家留学基金委项目“国家建设高水平公派研究生项目”(CSCNo:202006100087)的研究成果。

摘　　要：海德格尔与胡塞尔的现象学方法之关联问题,一直是学界关注的焦点。而阐明这一问题的关键,就是澄清以上二者对“存在”的理解差异,并揭示海德格尔对范畴直观概念的继承与突破。据此,本文将从两个方面展开探究:其一,以海德格尔的《时间概念史导论》(GA20)为线索,即重点围绕海德格尔对胡塞尔现象学方法要点之梳理,该部分将审查二者对意向性、范畴直观与先天概念的不同读解,以说明二者基于各自的哲学框架,何以对“存在”给出了不同的解释。其二,回到《逻辑研究》《存在与时间》等文本,揭示以上分歧的两个关键点:第一点即依据存在与真理之关联,揭示二者对“存在”规定之差异;第二点即依据存在与现象学范畴之关联,揭示二者对“存在规定方式”之理解差异。The phenomenological connection between Heidegger and Husserl represents a pivotal juncture in philosophical inquiry.To address this issue,it is essential to elucidate the disparate interpretations of"Sein"with their respective philosophies and to explicate how Heidegger appropriated and transcended the concept of categorial intuition.To achieve this,the present thesis will be structured into two principal parts.The first part comprises an exegetical analysis of Heidegger's Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs(GA20),with a particular emphasis on his critical examination of Husserl's phenomenology.This section will scrutinize their differing views on intentionality,categorial intuition,and the concept of a priori,there by clarifying the underlying reasons for the disparate interpretations of"Sein"within their philosophical frameworks.The second part undertakes a reevaluation of Logische Untersuchungen and Sein und Zeit,among other works.This section will explore two points of divergence.The first point isthe connection between"Sein"and truth,aiming to clarify their distinct understandings of the manifestation of"Sein".The second point is the connection between"Sein"and phenomenological categories,aiming to clarify their distinct understandings of the determination of"Sein".

关 键 词：海德格尔 胡塞尔 存在 真理 现象学范畴 

分 类 号：B1[哲学宗教—世界哲学]