检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周媛 徐平[1] ZHOU Yuan;XU Ping
机构地区:[1]北京林业大学人文社会科学学院
出 处:《河北法律职业教育》2025年第4期46-51,共6页HEBEI VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OF LAW
摘 要:生态修复费用的适用体现了恢复性司法理念在我国环境刑事领域的渗透。实证研究表明,生态修复费用在环境刑事案件的适用上缺乏统一规范,还存在着法律规定的缺位、适用范围的狭窄、裁判的标准不一致以及修复资金的运用存在漏洞等困境。对此,应当通过完善上位法之依据,扩大案件适用之范围,同时确立量刑情节分阶段分层级从轻之制度来保障生态修复费用在环境刑事案件中更好的应用。The application of ecological restoration costs reflects the penetration of restorative justice concepts in China’s environmental criminal field.Empirical research shows that the application of ecological restoration costs in environmental criminal cases lacks unified standards,and there are challenges such as gaps in legal provisions,narrow scope of application,inconsistent sentencing criteria,and loopholes in the use of restoration funds.To address these issues,it is necessary to improve the basis of higher-level laws,expand the scope of application,and establish a phased and hierarchical system for mitigating sentencing factors to ensure the better application of ecological restoration costs in environmental criminal cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7