检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李如东 LI Rudong
机构地区:[1]上海外国语大学上海全球治理与区域国别研究院,上海201620
出 处:《思想战线》2025年第2期95-108,共14页Thinking
基 金:“上海市白玉兰人才计划浦江项目”阶段性成果(2023PJC083)。
摘 要:道咸之际的西北史地学不仅拓展了中国的域外知识,而且成为其后一段时期内我国诸学术领域“西域—中亚”研究的知识源头之一。19世纪20年代至20世纪90年代初期,在地缘结构与知识制度的重构过程中,“西域-中亚”知识的本体关联性被转换到域内与域外两个空间范畴,其知识也转移到不同的研究领域,并在新的知识本体中被加以运用。重返西北史地研究,追踪其知识流变过程中的断裂、转移以及它在不同学术语境中的转换过程,有助于观察中国中亚研究的知识线索流变与生产机制的重构。The historiography and geography of China’s northwestern regions during the Daoguang and Xianfeng eras(1820-1860)not only expanded the nation’s understanding of foreign territories but also laid a crucial foundation for the study of“Xiyu(西域)-Central Asia”across various academic disciplines in China in the subsequent periods.From the 1920s to the early 1990s,amid the reconstruction of geopolitical structures and knowledge systems,the ontological connection between“Xiyu(西域)-Central Asia”was redefined within two distinct categories:domestic and foreign.Correspondingly,related knowledge was redistributed across different academic disciplines and integrated into new epistemological frameworks,reflecting shifts in scholarly focus and methodology.Revisiting the historiography and geography of the northwestern regions,and examining the ruptures,transfers,and transformations in the flow of knowledge over time,provides valuable insights into the evolution of knowledge trajectories in Chinese Central Asian studies and the reconstruction of the production mechanisms across different academic contexts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49