数智化赋能企业双元创新的组态路径研究——以计算机及相关制造业为例  

Research on the configuration paths of the dual innovation of digital-and intelligence-enabled enterprises:A case study of the computer and its related manufacturing industry

作　　者：王永贵 张思祺 张二伟 尚铎 Wang Yonggui;Zhang Siqi;Zhang Erwei;Shang Duo(School of Business Administration,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,Zhejiang,China;Intelligent Management Institute of China,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,Zhejiang,China;College of Business Administration,Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijing 100070,China;School of Economics and Management,University of Science and Technology Beijing,Beijing 100083,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江工商大学工商管理学院,浙江杭州310018 [2]浙江工商大学中国智能管理研究院,浙江杭州310018 [3]首都经济贸易大学工商管理学院,北京100070 [4]北京科技大学经济管理学院,北京100083

出　　处：《科研管理》2025年第4期44-53,共10页Science Research Management

基　　金：国家自然科学基金重点项目:“数字化背景下的企业定制化战略研究”(72032004,2021.01—2025.12);北京市自然科学基金面上项目:“京津冀地区链上企业数智化与链主企业开放式创新‘测量、机制及边界研究’”(9252009,2025.01—2028.01)。

摘　　要：创新作为引领发展的第一动力,是推动我国经济建设的重要力量。然而我国企业仍在创新能力、持续创新、协调创新等方面存在诸多挑战。随着企业信息化进程的不断深入,数智化赋能成为企业提升创新能力与获取持续竞争优势的新动力。本文基于资源编排理论与创新生态系统理论,遵循TOE框架,以275家计算机、通信和电子设备制造企业为例,采用fsQCA方法,探究数智化赋能企业实现高双元创新的多种联动路径组合。研究发现:第一,技术水平、组织特质、环境特征均不能单独作为实现高双元创新的必要条件,需要三者协同发挥作用。第二,探索式创新与开发式创新具有差异化的驱动路径。其中,探索式创新有三条驱动路径:组织与环境双元逻辑下的技术研发驱动型,技术与环境双元逻辑下的数智高管驱动型,技术、组织与环境三元驱动型;开发式创新有一条驱动路径:技术与组织双元驱动型。在数智化赋能下,探索式创新的驱动路径更为多样化,基于全新概念或技术范式的创新发展更加依赖不同数智化条件之间的协同联动。第三,技术条件是发展高双元创新的重要核心条件,当技术条件足够优越时,组织条件与环境条件存在替代关系,均可与技术条件产生协同效应,共同推动高双元创新发展。本研究有助于增进对企业双元创新复杂机制的理解,并为政策制定提供重要参考。Innovation,as the primary driving force for development,is a crucial power in propelling China′s economic construction.However,Chinese enterprises still face numerous challenges such as weak innovation capabilities,insufficient continuous innovation,and low coordinated innovation abilities.With the deepening of enterprise informatization processes,digital and intelligent empowerment has become a new driving force for enterprises to enhance their innovative capabilities and gain sustainable competitive advantages.Based on the resource orchestration theory and the innovation ecosystem theory,following the TOE framework and using 275 computer,communication,and electronic equipment manufacturing enterprises as examples,this paper employed the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis(fsQCA)method to investigate various linkage path combinations through which digital and intelligent empowerment can achieve dual innovation in enterprises.The study found that:Firstly,technical level,organizational characteristics,and environmental features cannot individually serve as necessary conditions for achieving high dual innovation;they need to work synergistically.Secondly,exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation have differentiated driving paths.Specifically,there are three driving paths for exploratory innovation:the technology research and development-driven type under the dual logic of organization and environment,the digital and intelligent executive-driven type under the dual logic of technology and environment,and the triple driving type under the logic of technology,organization,and environment;while there is one driving path for exploitative innovation:the dual driving type under the logic of technology and organization.Under digital and intelligent empowerment,the driving paths for exploratory innovation are more diverse,and the development of innovation based on entirely new concepts or technological paradigms relies more heavily on the synergistic linkage between different digital and intelligent condit

关 键 词：数智化 双元创新 组态路径 TOE框架 计算机企业 

分 类 号：F272.3[经济管理—企业管理]