以“栭”为例——回应1930年代中古建筑名物研究  

Using“Er”as an Example:A Response to the Study of Ancient Architectural Onomatology in 1930s

作　　者：冯棣[1] 王璠 文艺 FENG Di;WANG Fan;WEN Yi

机构地区：[1]重庆大学建筑城规学院

出　　处：《建筑师》2025年第2期52-62,共11页The Architect

基　　金：国家自然科学基金面上项目(51678085);教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(21XJAZH001)。

摘　　要：20世纪30年代出现了一批看似零散、偶然的中古木构建筑名物研究成果,作者群主要来自日本建筑史、美术史学界、中国营造学社及其他民间个人研究。深究这一学术现象,与20世纪30年代日本建筑史学所处的学术困惑、近代建筑史学考古发现、清代朴学大昌等背景有密切联系。本文以刘敦桢早期研究关注为线索,对20世纪30年代出现的中古建筑名物研究进行梳理,结合个人的田野发现,以“栭”为例,对该年代出现的中古建筑名物研究现象进行当代回应;着重强调名物研究对于架构中古早期建筑史的重要性,同时列出该研究领域可能陷入的误区并予以提示。In the 1930s,there appeared a group of seemingly scattered and accidental research results on the names of early ancient wooden buildings,and the authors were mainly from the Japanese architectural history and art history circles,Society for Research in Chinese Architecture,and other private individual.This academic phenomenon is closely related to the academic perplexity of Japanese architectural historiography in the 1930s,the archaeological discoveries of modern architectural historiography,and the great prosperity of the textology in the Qing Dynasty.Taking LIU Dunzhen’s early research concerns as a clue,the paper comprehends the research on the names of early ancient buildings that appeared in the 1930s.Taking the example of“Er”,the paper is a contemporary response to the phenomenon of architectural onomatology that emerged in the 1930s.The paper emphasizes the importance of the study of onomatology in the structuring of the history of early ancient architecture,and at the same time hints are given about the possible misconceptions of research in this field.

关 键 词：名物研究 中古早期建筑史 斗栱组件 栭 

分 类 号：TU-092[建筑科学—建筑理论] TU-093