求同存异:经济法责任与其他部门法责任的同一性与特殊性  

Seeking Common Ground While Preserving Differences:The Commonality and Particularity of Economic Law Liability and Other Branches of Legal Liability

作　　者：丁庭威 DING Ting-wei(Law School,Peking University,Beijing,100091)

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100091

出　　处：《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2025年第2期115-123,共9页Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences

基　　金：国家重点研发计划项目“跨领域知识驱动的法治调研智能感知及辅助决策技术研究”(2022YFC3301900)。

摘　　要：经济法责任理论的完善是经济法学走向成熟的重要标志,但学界对其研究并不完备。目前,学界对于经济法责任是否存在主要持“否定说”与“肯定说”两种观点,二者均因过分关注经济法责任与其他部门法责任的界限而忽视了其联结,辩证视角的缺乏使得经济法责任具有独立性的理论说服力相对有限。若要实现对经济法责任的理性认知,应在把握经济法责任与其他部门法责任同一性的基础上探寻其特殊性,在求同存异的过程中明确其独立性,同时秉持“本质求同—方法革新—类别存异—责任独立”的研究思路。具言之,首先应探寻法律责任的同一性,明晰所有法律责任的本质在于法律主体因受到制裁而需要承担“不利益”;其次应革新研究方法,扬弃传统的“责任—独立”分析范式,重构“独立—主体—行为—责任”的新分析范式,探寻经济法责任要件与分类的特殊性;最终,在新分析范式与责任分类的基础之上,消解经济法责任与其他部门法责任间的含混,确立经济法责任的独立性,实现经济法责任理论的自足与自洽。Refining the theory of economic law liability marks a significant step toward the maturation of economic law as a discipline.However,academic research on this subject remains incomplete.Currently,two primary perspectives dominate the discourse on the existence of economic law liability:the“negation theory”and the“affirmation theory”.Both viewpoints overemphasize the distinction between economic law liability and other branches of legal liability while neglecting their interconnections.The lack of a dialectical perspective makes the theory of independence of economic law responsibility relatively limited.To achieve a rational understanding of economic law liability,its particularity should be explored based on recognizing its commonality with other legal liabilities.Through the approach of“seeking common ground while preserving differences”,its independence should be clarified while adhering to the research framework of“essential commonality—methodological innovation—categorical differentiation—independent liability”.Specifically,the first step is to explore the commonality of legal liability and clarify that the essence of all legal liabilities lies in the“detriment”that legal subjects must bear as a consequence of sanctions.Secondly,research methods should be innovated by discarding the traditional“liability-independence”analytical paradigm and reconstructing a new framework of“independence—subject—conduct—liability”to explore the particularity of the elements and classification of economic law liability.Finally,based on this new analytical paradigm and classification system,ambiguities between economic law liability and other branches of legal liability should be resolved,thereby establishing the independence of economic law liability and ensuring the self-sufficiency and self-consistency of the responsibility theory of economic law.

关 键 词：经济法责任 其他部门法责任 同一性 特殊性 独立性 

分 类 号：D923.1[政治法律—民商法学]