曹植赋在南朝的受容及其原因  

Acceptance and Its Reasons of Cao Zhi’s Fu in Southern Dynasties

作　　者：黄志立 刁菘坚 HUANG Zhi-li;DIAO Song-jian(School of Chinese Language&Literature,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510006,China)

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学文学院,广东广州510006

出　　处：《辽东学院学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期1-7,共7页Journal of Liaodong University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：广东省教育厅高校古籍整理研究项目“岭南赋整理与研究”(2022GJZL09)。

摘　　要：曹植《洛神赋》以外的赋作在南朝呈现出明显的不受容状态,这与其“建安之杰”的崇高地位及丰赡的赋体创作状况不相匹配,该现象背后不仅有其五言诗成就对其赋体创作的外部遮蔽,还存在名篇《洛神赋》对其他赋篇的内部遮蔽。《洛神赋》之外的赋作存在不同于前者的小品化、浅俗化的创作特色,这种创作趋向直接导致此类赋作在“争一字之巧”的南朝文学中被有意忽视与否定。此不受容的表征背后既是曹植自身创作选择与南朝文学思想交叉影响下的必然,又是赋这一文体从“破体”走向诗化的文学发展规律的结果。In the Southern Dynasties,Cao Zhi’s Fu writings other than Luoshen Fu were not accepted widely,which did not match the lofty status of Cao Zhi as an outstanding writer of Jian’an period and the large number of his Fu works.Behind this phenomenon is not only the external shadow of his five-character poetry achievements on his Fu creation,but also the internal shadow of the famous Luoshen Fu on other Fu works.Cao Zhi’s Fu writings other than Luoshen Fu have different characteristics of essay and vulgarization,which leads to the intentional neglect and negation of such Fu works in the literature of the Southern Dynasties.Behind this unacceptable representation is not only the necessity of Cao Zhi’s own choice and the influence of the literary thought of the Southern Dynasties,but also the result of the literary development law that Fu’s style is broken to that of poetry.

关 键 词：曹植赋 《洛神赋》 建安文学 南朝文学 受容 

分 类 号：I222.4[文学—中国文学]