检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王冠艺 WANG Guanyi(Inner Mongolia Prosecutor’s Continuing Education College,Hohhot,Inner Mongolia 010000)
机构地区:[1]内蒙古检察官进修学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010000
出 处:《呼伦贝尔学院学报》2025年第2期106-110,共5页Journal of Hulunbuir University
摘 要:《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第五十五条规定了刑事案件的证明标准,此条位于《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》总则中,统领其他四编,但其并未区分不同诉讼阶段的证明标准。本文通过典型案例分析,深入剖析该一致的证明标准所导致司法实践中出现的一系列问题,并在此基础上通过对认识规律、证据特性、证明方式的分析,明确提出解决构建阶梯化刑事证明标准问题的具体路径。Article 55 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates the standard of proof for criminal cases.This article is located in the general provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China,which governs the other four parts.The article does not distinguish the proof at different stages of litigation,and this paper,through case analysis,deeply explores the series of problems that this uniform standard of proof has led to in practice.Based on this,by analyzing the laws of cognition,the nature of evidence,and the methods of proof,the paper proposes the construction of a more hierarchical criminal standard of proof as an effective solution to the problem.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7