检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:农明进[1]
机构地区:[1]右江民族医学院附属医院CT室,广西百色533000
出 处:《右江民族医学院学报》2002年第6期813-814,共2页Journal of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities
摘 要:目的 探讨胰腺癌各种影像学诊断的优势互补。方法 对 86例疑为胰腺癌的病例分别进行胃十二指肠钡剂造影检查、ERCP、US、CT及腹腔动脉造影 ,并进行对比。结果 US最敏感 ,但准确率有待进一步提高 ,占 5 4% ;CT诊断准确率高 ,占 87% ;腹腔动脉造影和ERCP检查方法有一定的难度。结论 胰腺癌的影像学诊断应首选US ,其次是CT ,不能确诊时再选用腹腔动脉造影或ERCP ,以提高胰腺癌诊断的准确率。Objective To explore the advantages of various imaging diagnostic methods on cancer of pancreas. Methods 86 patients doubted with cancer of pancreas were given the examination with gastroduodenal barium contrast radiography technique, ERCP, US, CT and angiography of celiac artery, and then the results were compared with each other. Results The best sensitivity was US, but the accuracy rate was only 54%, still needed to be further improved. The high accuracy was CT; the accuracy rate was 87%. The operation of celiac artery and ERCP had some difficulties. Conclusions US should be the first choice for imaging diagnosis on cancer of pancreas, the second one should be CT. When the diagnosis was uncertain, angiography of celiac artery and ERCP should be used to increase the accuracy rate of diagnosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80