检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏永清[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学,北京100038
出 处:《湖北函授大学学报》2015年第5期76-77 80,80,共3页
摘 要:刑事侦查阶段采取不同的强制措施要符合刑诉法的有关规定,与犯罪嫌疑人的人身危险性、社会危害性相关。强制措施的变更应兼顾侦破犯和保障人权的双重要求。它在立法上有相应的规定,也是司法实践当中的一种常见现象,有其必要性和积极作用。我国现行刑事诉讼法在关于侦查阶段强制措施的变更之规定上有它的科学之处,也存在着一些问题,突出表现在逮捕后变更强制措施上存在立法上的缺陷和司法操作上的随意性。因此,对于侦查阶段强制措施的变更要在立法上进一步完善规定,建立切实可行的监督机制。The different compulsory measures adopted in the stage of Criminal Investigation should comply with the related regu-lation of the criminal procedure law,which associate with the offender's dangerousness and social harm.The change of compul-sory measures should gratify the double requirement of the human rights protection and investigative activities.It has related regulation in legislation and also to be a common phenomenon in the justice practice with the positive effects.Change of com-pulsory measures in the criminal investigation stage is scientific but also has some problems.Especially for the shortcomings in legislation and randomness in justice operation.Therefore,change of compulsory measures in the criminal investigation stage should be improved based on the legislation and establish the practical and feasible supervision mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49