检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙长永[1]
机构地区:[1]湘潭大学,湖南湘潭411105
出 处:《政法论坛》2002年第6期44-50,共7页Tribune of Political Science and Law
摘 要:辩诉交易是特定条件之下才能正常运行并且倍受争议的一项制度 ,多数国家都对它采取了极其谨慎的态度 ,它不符合中国的法律精神和司法实际 ,也不是解决刑讯逼供、超期羁押等问题的适当手段 ,如果引入 ,会对侦查、起诉和审判制度形成强烈冲击 ,破坏正在逐步完善的程序法制 ,加剧司法腐败。因此 ,中国法不应当、也没有必要采用辩诉交易制度。Plea bargaining can normally operates under special conditions and is a system causing a lot of controversies. Most countries have cautious attitudes toward it. Plea bargaining does not fit Chinese legal spirits and judicial practice, and is not a proper means to settle the problems such as exacting a confession by torture and extended custody. If it is introduced, the strong impact will be made on the systems of investigation, prosecution, and trial, the gradually perfected system of procedure will be destroyed, and judicial corruption will be intensified. Therefore, China shouldn't and has no necessity to adopt the system of plea bargaining.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15