共同过失与共同犯罪  

Unpremeditated Joint Crime and Joint Crime

作　　者：张明楷[1] 

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084

出　　处：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2003年第2期39-46,共8页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：关于过失犯罪与共同犯罪的关系,旧中国刑法与刑法理论采取了以下定式:新派———主观主义———行为共同说———承认过失的共同犯罪;旧派———客观主义———犯罪共同说———否认过失的共同犯罪;新中国刑法及理论通说否认过失的共同犯罪,但理论上的论证存在疑问;审判实践已悄悄地承认共同过失犯罪,对共同过失犯罪适用"部分实行全部责任"的原则;在现行刑法之下,难以从解释论上肯定过失的共同犯罪;作为立法论,肯定过失的共同正犯的主张具有合理性;没有必要继续维持上述定式,在行为人共同引起了法益侵害,并且对法益侵害共同过失的情况下,各行为人理当对共同引起的法益侵害承担刑事责任。In terms of the relation between unpremeditated crime and joint crime, in old China, Criminal Law and the theory of criminal law assumed the following patterns, those are, new school-subjectivism-joint action theoryacknowledging unpremeditated joint crime; old school-objectivism-joint crime theory-unacknowledging the unpremeditated joint crime; the new Chinese Criminal Law and theory of criminal law deny the joint unpremeditated crime, but leave some theoretical unsolved problems; judicial practices have automatically acknowledged the unpremeditated joint crimes, but under the existed criminal law, it is hard to acknowledge the unpremeditated joint crime on the basis of interpretation theory; on the basis of legislation theory, it is reasonable to acknowledge the joint unpremeditated crime: when the violating action caused by several people and the action occurred joint unpremeditatedly, the actors should jointly bear the criminal obligation.

关 键 词：共同犯罪 共同过失犯罪 共同过失犯罪正犯 

分 类 号：D924.11[政治法律—刑法学]