检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872 [2]中国财政金融政策研究中心,北京100872
出 处:《国家检察官学院学报》2003年第1期23-30,118,共9页Journal of National Prosecutors College
摘 要:最高人民法院《关于民事诉讼证据规则的若干规定》存在着一些不容忽视的问题,如证明负担分配扩大化,并与实体法的规定不一致、对司法认知法则、自认法则、推定法则、举证妨碍法则的规定有矛盾等,应在民事证据法立法中加以解决。The author finds that a few unavoidable problems exist in the Regulations concerning the Rules of Evidence in Civil Proceedings issued by the Supreme People's Court, e.g., the extension of the allocation of the burden of proof which is inconsistent with the substantial law; the contradiction between the rules of judicial notice, presumption and that of the impeding of the burden of proof, etc.. It is therefore advocated that such problems should be resolved in the legislative process of the civil evidence law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.39