检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《肿瘤》2003年第2期156-157,166,共3页Tumor
摘 要:目的 评价化疗及放疗预防食管癌淋巴结转移的疗效。方法 :70例食管癌患者随机分为化疗预防组 (A组 ) 35例 ,放射预防组 (B组 ) 35例。结果 治疗后 2年 ,总的淋巴结转移率A组 34.2 9% ,B组 48.5 7% ( χ2 =1.472 ,P =0 .2 2 5 )。锁骨上颈部、纵隔、贲门胃左动脉旁、腹腔淋巴结转移率A组分别为 8.5 7% ,11.43 % ,8.5 7% ,5 .71% ,B组分别为 5 .71% ,31.43% ,5 .71% ,5 .71% χ2 与P值分别为 :χ2 =0 .2 15 ,P =0 .6 43;χ2 =4.15 8,P =0 .0 41;χ2 =0 .2 15 ,P =0 .6 43 ;χ2 =0 ,P =1.0 0。A组 (CR +PR) 91.43% ,B组 71.43% ( χ2 =4.6 2 9,P =0 .0 31) ,两组生存率差异有显著意义 ( χ2 =4.6 2 9,P =0 .0 31)。结论 食管癌淋巴结转移预防性治疗 ,以化疗放疗合并预防优于单独放疗预防。Objective To evaluate the effect of preventive treatment for lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer. Methods 70 patients with esophageal cancer were randomizd into two groups. 35 patients was in Chemo-radio-preventive group (Group A) and 35 patients was in radio-preventive group (Group B). Results In the second year after treatment the total rate of lymph node metasrasis was 34.29%(12 /35) in Group A, 48.57%(17 /35) in Group B ( χ 2 =1.472,P =0.225). The rate of lymph node metastasis for supraclavicular, mediastinum, cardiac gastric and upper abdomen around esophagus was 8.57%(3 /35), 11.43% (4 /35),8.57%(3 /35), 5.71% (2 /35) in Group A. was 5.71% (2 /35),31.43%(11 /35), 5.71% (2 /35), 5.71% (2 /35) in Group B ( χ 2 =0.215,P =0.643. χ 2 =4.158,P=0.041. χ 2 =0.215,P=0.643. χ 2 =0,P = 1.00 ). The rate of (CR+PR)was 91.43%(32 /35) in Group A, was 71.43%(25 /35) in Group B( χ 2 =4.629,P= 0.031)The difference of the survival rate between the two groups was statistically significant. Conclusion Chemoradio-prevention is better than radiotherapy prevention alone for lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.224.59.3